GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of R7 M260 vs 1050 among all GPUs

Gaming

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more

Graphics

T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more

Computing

Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more

Performance per Watt

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Noise and Power

TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more

6.8

Overall Score

Winner
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050 

GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050  based on its benchmarks.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Radeon R7 M260

Reasons to consider the
AMD Radeon R7 M260

Report a correction

GPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the AMD Radeon R7 M260 vs the Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050.

Front view of GeForce GTX 1050

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050

Report a correction
Much higher clock speed 1,354 MHz vs 620 MHz Around 2.2x higher clock speed
Significantly better PassMark score 4,443 vs 653 More than 6.8x better PassMark score
Significantly higher effective memory clock speed 7,008 MHz vs 4,000 MHz More than 75% higher effective memory clock speed
Much higher turbo clock speed 1,455 MHz vs 715 MHz More than 2x higher turbo clock speed
Significantly higher pixel rate 46.56 GPixel/s vs 5.72 GPixel/s Around 8.2x higher pixel rate
Significantly better fire strike factor score 41.35 vs 8.23 More than 5x better fire strike factor score
Higher memory bandwidth 112.1 GB/s vs 64 GB/s More than 75% higher memory bandwidth
Better floating-point performance 1,862 GFLOPS vs 549.1 GFLOPS Around 3.5x better floating-point performance
More render output processors 32 vs 8 24 more render output processors
Slightly more memory 2,048 MB vs 1,024 MB 2x more memory
Significantly higher memory clock speed 1,752 MHz vs 1,000 MHz More than 75% higher memory clock speed
Higher texture rate 58.2 GTexel/s vs 17.16 GTexel/s Around 3.5x higher texture rate
Better T-Rex score 4.45 frames/s vs 0.93 frames/s More than 4.8x better T-Rex score
Higher metro: last light framerate 44.5 vs 13.4 More than 3.2x higher metro: last light framerate

Benchmarks Real world tests of Radeon R7 M260 vs GeForce GTX 1050

Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon R7 M260
77.89 mHash/s
GeForce GTX 1050
215.14 mHash/s

Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon R7 M260
14.25 mPixels/s
GeForce GTX 1050
67.49 mPixels/s

T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon R7 M260
1,688.22
GeForce GTX 1050
3,357.16

Manhattan (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon R7 M260
1,718.67
GeForce GTX 1050
3,710.62

Fire Strike Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Sky Diver Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Battlefield 4

Bioshock Infinite

Comments

comments powered by Disqus