Winner
Nvidia GeForce GTX 850M
GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce GTX 850M based on its gaming and benchmarks.
See full details | Radeon R7 M260 vs GeForce GTX 850M |
Gaming | |
| |
Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more |
Graphics | |
| |
T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more |
Computing | |
| |
Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more |
Performance per Watt | |
| |
Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more |
Value | |
| |
Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more |
Noise and Power | |
| |
TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more |
6.3 | Overall Score |
| |
Winner |
| ![]() | Nvidia GeForce GTX 850MGPUBoss Winner |
| |||||||
Higher effective memory clock speed | 4,000 MHz | vs | 2,002 MHz | Around 2x higher effective memory clock speed | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Higher memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | vs | 32 GB/s | 2x higher memory bandwidth | |||
| |||||||
Much better T-Rex score | 2,606.42 | vs | 1,688.22 | Around 55% better T-Rex score | |||
Significantly higher clock speed | 902 MHz | vs | 620 MHz | More than 45% higher clock speed | |||
Better PassMark score | 1,499 | vs | 653 | More than 2.2x better PassMark score | |||
Significantly better 3DMark vantage graphics score | 14,358.5 | vs | 4,787 | Around 3x better 3DMark vantage graphics score | |||
Significantly better 3DMark 11 graphics score | 16,135 | vs | 7,810 | More than 2x better 3DMark 11 graphics score | |||
Much higher dead space 3 framerate | 57.85 fps | vs | 21.5 fps | Around 2.8x higher dead space 3 framerate | |||
Better 3DMark06 score | 4,385.5 | vs | 1,897 | More than 2.2x better 3DMark06 score | |||
More memory | 2,048 MB | vs | 1,024 MB | 2x more memory | |||
Much higher diablo III framerate | 61 fps | vs | 37.5 fps | Around 65% higher diablo III framerate | |||
Much higher crysis 3 framerate | 14 fps | vs | 6.8 fps | More than 2x higher crysis 3 framerate | |||
Better floating-point performance | 1,154.6 GFLOPS | vs | 549.1 GFLOPS | More than 2x better floating-point performance | |||
Higher turbo clock speed | 936 MHz | vs | 715 MHz | More than 30% higher turbo clock speed | |||
Higher pixel rate | 14.43 GPixel/s | vs | 5.72 GPixel/s | More than 2.5x higher pixel rate | |||
Higher texture rate | 36.1 GTexel/s | vs | 17.16 GTexel/s | More than 2x higher texture rate | |||
Better T-Rex score | 2.43 frames/s | vs | 0.93 frames/s | More than 2.5x better T-Rex score | |||
Higher bioshock infinite framerate | 28.4 | vs | 8.4 | Around 3.5x higher bioshock infinite framerate | |||
More render output processors | 16 | vs | 8 | Twice as many render output processors | |||
Higher BioShock infinite framerate | 28.4 fps | vs | 13.5 fps | More than 2x higher BioShock infinite framerate | |||
Better fire strike factor score | 26.99 | vs | 8.23 | More than 3.2x better fire strike factor score | |||
More shading units | 640 | vs | 384 | 256 more shading units | |||
More texture mapping units | 40 | vs | 24 | 16 more texture mapping units |
Looking for a laptop?
![]() | VS | ![]() |
860M vs 850M | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
750M vs 850M | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
840M vs 850M | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
950M vs 850M | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
760M vs 850M | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
840M vs R7 M260 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
740M vs R7 M260 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$280 | ||
1050 Ti vs 1060 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$280 | ||
1060 vs 970 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
1050 Ti vs 970 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$280 | ||
RX 580 vs 1060 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
960 vs 970 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
1050 Ti vs 960 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
R9 390 vs 970 | ||