GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of R7 M260 vs 860M among Laptop GPUs

Gaming

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more

Graphics

T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more

Computing

Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more

Performance per Watt

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Value

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Noise and Power

TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more

6.4

Overall Score

Winner
Nvidia GeForce GTX 860M 

GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce GTX 860M  based on its gaming and benchmarks.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Radeon R7 M260

Reasons to consider the
AMD Radeon R7 M260

Report a correction

GPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the AMD Radeon R7 M260 vs the Nvidia GeForce GTX 860M.

Front view of GeForce GTX 860M

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX 860M

Report a correction
Much better 3DMark 11 graphics score 23,220.5 vs 7,810 Around 3x better 3DMark 11 graphics score
Significantly higher clock speed 1,020 MHz vs 620 MHz Around 65% higher clock speed
Significantly better 3DMark vantage graphics score 18,276.5 vs 4,787 More than 3.8x better 3DMark vantage graphics score
Significantly better PassMark score 1,719 vs 653 Around 2.8x better PassMark score
Much higher dead space 3 framerate 84.5 fps vs 21.5 fps Around 4x higher dead space 3 framerate
Better 3DMark06 score 4,902 vs 1,897 More than 2.5x better 3DMark06 score
Much higher diablo III framerate 105.24 fps vs 37.5 fps More than 2.8x higher diablo III framerate
Much better manhattan score 3,719.08 vs 1,718.67 Around 2.2x better manhattan score
Much higher crysis 3 framerate 18.75 fps vs 6.8 fps More than 2.8x higher crysis 3 framerate
More memory 2,048 MB vs 1,024 MB 2x more memory
Significantly higher turbo clock speed 1,085 MHz vs 715 MHz More than 50% higher turbo clock speed
Higher effective memory clock speed 5,012 MHz vs 4,000 MHz More than 25% higher effective memory clock speed
Better floating-point performance 1,305.6 GFLOPS vs 549.1 GFLOPS Around 2.5x better floating-point performance
Higher pixel rate 16.32 GPixel/s vs 5.72 GPixel/s More than 2.8x higher pixel rate
Higher texture rate 40.8 GTexel/s vs 17.16 GTexel/s Around 2.5x higher texture rate
Significantly higher BioShock infinite framerate 41.57 fps vs 13.5 fps More than 3x higher BioShock infinite framerate
Better bitcoin mining score 162.83 mHash/s vs 77.89 mHash/s More than 2x better bitcoin mining score
Significantly higher metro: last light framerate 27.85 vs 13.4 More than 2x higher metro: last light framerate
Better fire strike factor score 33.42 vs 8.23 More than 4x better fire strike factor score
Higher memory clock speed 1,253 MHz vs 1,000 MHz More than 25% higher memory clock speed
More render output processors 16 vs 8 Twice as many render output processors
More shading units 640 vs 384 256 more shading units
More texture mapping units 40 vs 24 16 more texture mapping units

Benchmarks Real world tests of Radeon R7 M260 vs GeForce GTX 860M

Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon R7 M260
77.89 mHash/s
GeForce GTX 860M
162.83 mHash/s

Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon R7 M260
14.25 mPixels/s
GeForce GTX 860M
22.83 mPixels/s

T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon R7 M260
1,688.22
GeForce GTX 860M
2,890.54

Manhattan (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon R7 M260
1,718.67
GeForce GTX 860M
3,719.08

Fire Strike Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Sky Diver Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Battlefield 4

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus