0 Comments
| Radeon R7 M265 vs GeForce 710M |
VS
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Much better T-Rex score | 3,360.64 | vs | 3,343.1 | Almost the same | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
More memory | 2,048 MB | vs | 1,024 MB | 2x more memory | |||
Slightly better 3DMark vantage graphics score | 5,976.5 | vs | 3,968.5 | More than 50% better 3DMark vantage graphics score | |||
Slightly better 3DMark06 score | 1,882 | vs | 1,106.5 | More than 70% better 3DMark06 score | |||
Better particle simulation score | 138.46 mInteraction/s | vs | 62.78 mInteraction/s | Around 2.2x better particle simulation score | |||
Wider memory bus | 128 bit | vs | 64 bit | 2x wider memory bus | |||
More shading units | 384 | vs | 96 | 288 more shading units | |||
| |||||||
Slightly higher clock speed | 775 MHz | vs | 725 MHz | More than 5% higher clock speed |
Benchmarks Real world tests of Radeon R7 M265 vs GeForce 710M
Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench
Radeon R7 M265
68.39 mHash/s
GeForce 710M
19.85 mHash/s
Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench
Radeon R7 M265
12.03 mPixels/s
GeForce 710M
6.51 mPixels/s
Ocean surface simulation Data courtesy CompuBench
Radeon R7 M265
282.11 frames/s
GeForce 710M
148.16 frames/s
Particle simulation Data courtesy CompuBench
Radeon R7 M265
138.46 mInteraction/s
GeForce 710M
62.78 mInteraction/s
T-Rex (Compubench 1.5) Data courtesy CompuBench
Radeon R7 M265
1.45 frames/s
GeForce 710M
0.59 frames/s
Video composition Data courtesy CompuBench
Radeon R7 M265
21.7 frames/s
GeForce 710M
11.72 frames/s
T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench
Radeon R7 M265
3,360.64
GeForce 710M
3,343.1
Manhattan (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench
Radeon R7 M265
3,706.64
GeForce 710M
3,356
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
Popular Comparisons
Read more
Comments
Showing 1 comment.
Omar Alamodi (03:22 PM, November 19, 2015)