Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Radeon R7 M265

Reasons to consider the
AMD Radeon R7 M265

Report a correction
Much better T-Rex score 3,360.64 vs 3,343.1 Almost the same
More memory 2,048 MB vs 1,024 MB 2x more memory
Slightly better 3DMark vantage graphics score 5,976.5 vs 3,968.5 More than 50% better 3DMark vantage graphics score
Slightly better 3DMark06 score 1,882 vs 1,106.5 More than 70% better 3DMark06 score
Better particle simulation score 138.46 mInteraction/s vs 62.78 mInteraction/s Around 2.2x better particle simulation score
Wider memory bus 128 bit vs 64 bit 2x wider memory bus
More shading units 384 vs 96 288 more shading units
Front view of GeForce 710M

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce 710M

Report a correction
Slightly higher clock speed 775 MHz vs 725 MHz More than 5% higher clock speed

Benchmarks Real world tests of Radeon R7 M265 vs GeForce 710M

Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon R7 M265
68.39 mHash/s
GeForce 710M
19.85 mHash/s

Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon R7 M265
12.03 mPixels/s
GeForce 710M
6.51 mPixels/s

Ocean surface simulation Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon R7 M265
282.11 frames/s
GeForce 710M
148.16 frames/s

Particle simulation Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon R7 M265
138.46 mInteraction/s
GeForce 710M
62.78 mInteraction/s

T-Rex (Compubench 1.5) Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon R7 M265
1.45 frames/s
GeForce 710M
0.59 frames/s

Video composition Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon R7 M265
21.7 frames/s
GeForce 710M
11.72 frames/s

T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon R7 M265
3,360.64
GeForce 710M
3,343.1

Manhattan (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon R7 M265
3,706.64
GeForce 710M
3,356

Comments

Showing 1 comment.
amd is better
comments powered by Disqus