Winner
Nvidia GeForce GT 740M
GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce GT 740M based on its .
See full details| | Radeon R7 M265 vs GeForce GT 740M |
by Jeremy-Hellstrom (Oct, 2013)GPU Tweak- Easy overclocking and online streaming The included ASUS GPU Tweak utility enables R9 280X, R9 270X, R7 260X, R7 250, and R7 240 users intuitive control over GPU and video-memory clock speeds and voltages, cooling-fan speeds and power-consumption thresholds – so they can overclock easily with confidence.
by hassan-mujtaba (May, 2014)The core clock is maintained at 993 MHz for the reference models but comes with boost clock which has been absent on the GK107 chips.
Gaming | |
Real world tests using the latest 3D games | |
| Radeon R7 M265 5.7 GeForce GT 740M 5.9 | |
| BioShock Infinite and Diablo III | |
Benchmarks | |
Synthetic tests to measure overall performance | |
| Radeon R7 M265 6.4 GeForce GT 740M 6.5 | |
| 3DMark 11 Graphics, 3DMark Vantage Graphics and 3DMark06 | |
Compute Performance | |
General computing tests executed on the GPU | |
| Radeon R7 M265 N/A GeForce GT 740M N/A | |
| Passmark Direct Compute and CLBenchmark Raytrace | |
GPUBoss Score | |
Gaming, Benchmarks and Compute Performance | |
| Radeon R7 M265 5.9 GeForce GT 740M 6.0 | |
Winner |
| | | Nvidia GeForce GT 740MGPUBoss Winner |
| |||||||
| Better 3DMark 11 graphics score | 8,876 | vs | 1,873 | Around 4.8x better 3DMark 11 graphics score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Higher memory clock speed | 1,000 MHz | vs | 901 MHz | More than 10% higher memory clock speed | |||
| |||||||
| Significantly better 3DMark06 score | 10,161 | vs | 1,880 | Around 5.5x better 3DMark06 score | |||
| Higher clock speed | 810 MHz | vs | 725 MHz | More than 10% higher clock speed | |||
| More render output processors | 16 | vs | 8 | Twice as many render output processors | |||
| Higher texture rate | 25.9 GTexel/s | vs | 17.4 GTexel/s | Around 50% higher texture rate | |||
| Slightly more texture mapping units | 32 | vs | 24 | 8 more texture mapping units | |||
| Higher diablo III framerate | 46.2 fps | vs | 29.53 fps | More than 55% higher diablo III framerate | |||
Radeon R7 M265 | by Ryan-Smith (Sep, 2013)It’s not clear whether this is the same GPU as in 290X or not, and in lieu of specs AMD has given us a single benchmark: 3DMark Firemark, where it scores better than 6800.
Radeon R7 M265 | by Charles-Gantt (Sep, 2013)The R9-280X scored more than 6800 in 3DMark FireStorm and will retail for $299.
Radeon R7 M265 | by Charles-Gantt (Sep, 2013)Next up the chain is the all new Radeon R7-260X, a GPU that hits the midrange market with 2GB of GDDR5 memory and scores >3700 in 3DMark FireStorm all for just $139.
GeForce GT 740M | by Slobodan-Simic (Apr, 2013)Nvidia also claims that its new Geforce 700M series paired up with Geforce Experience can be used to play ten top 2012 games at optimal settings.
| VS | |
| 740M vs 840M | ||
| VS | |
| 740M vs 820M | ||
| VS | |
| 740M vs 8750M | ||
| VS | |
| 740M vs R5 M230 | ||
| VS | |
| 740M vs 8670M | ||
| VS | |
| R7 M265 vs 840M | ||
| VS | |
| R7 M265 vs 750M | ||
| VS | |
| 780 vs 970 | ||
| VS | |
| 780 Ti vs 980 | ||
| VS | |
| 770 vs 970 | ||
| VS | |
| R9 M295X vs 980M | ||
| VS | |
| 780 Ti vs 970 | ||
| VS | |
| 760 vs R9 270X | ||
| VS | |
| R9 290X vs 970 | ||