Winner
Nvidia GeForce GT 750M
GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce GT 750M based on its gaming and benchmarks.
See full details Radeon R7 M265 vs GeForce GT 750M |
Released January, 2014
AMD Radeon R7 M265
- 725 MHz
- 2 GB DDR3
6.2 Out of 10
by Jeremy-Hellstrom (Oct, 2013)GPU Tweak- Easy overclocking and online streaming The included ASUS GPU Tweak utility enables R9 280X, R9 270X, R7 260X, R7 250, and R7 240 users intuitive control over GPU and video-memory clock speeds and voltages, cooling-fan speeds and power-consumption thresholds – so they can overclock easily with confidence.
VS
Released January, 2013
Nvidia GeForce GT 750M
- 941 MHz
- 2 GB GDDR5
6.5 Out of 10
by Jarred-Walton (Apr, 2013)As for the Boost clocks, in practice that can increase the GPU core speed 15% or more over the normal value, with most games realizing a 10-15% performance thanks to the increase.
GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of R7 M265 vs 750M among Laptop GPUs
Gaming | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more | |
Graphics | |
| | |
| T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more | |
Computing | |
| | |
| Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more | |
Performance per Watt | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more | |
Value | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more | |
Noise and Power | |
| | |
| TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more | |
| 6.5 | Overall Score |
| | |
 | Winner |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?
VS
| |  | Nvidia GeForce GT 750MGPUBoss Winner |
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Better 3DMark 11 graphics score | 8,876 | vs | 2,543 | Around 3.5x better 3DMark 11 graphics score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||||
| Much better 3DMark06 score | 13,670 | vs | 1,882 | More than 7.2x better 3DMark06 score | |||
| Higher clock speed | 941 MHz | vs | 725 MHz | Around 30% higher clock speed | |||
| Higher effective memory clock speed | 4,000 MHz | vs | 1,800 MHz | Around 2.2x higher effective memory clock speed | |||
| Much better T-Rex score | 3,362.4 | vs | 1,711.65 | More than 95% better T-Rex score | |||
| Higher memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | vs | 28.8 GB/s | Around 2.2x higher memory bandwidth | |||
| Much higher diablo III framerate | 66.6 fps | vs | 29.53 fps | More than 2.2x higher diablo III framerate | |||
| Higher turbo clock speed | 967 MHz | vs | 825 MHz | More than 15% higher turbo clock speed | |||
| More render output processors | 16 | vs | 8 | Twice as many render output processors | |||
| Higher memory clock speed | 1,000 MHz | vs | 900 MHz | More than 10% higher memory clock speed | |||
| Slightly higher thief framerate | 10.5 | vs | 3.4 | More than 3x higher thief framerate | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of Radeon R7 M265 vs GeForce GT 750M
Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench
Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench
Ocean surface simulation Data courtesy CompuBench
T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench
Manhattan (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench
Thief
Bioshock Infinite
Metro: Last Light
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| 850M vs 750M | ||
 | VS | |
| 840M vs 750M | ||
 | VS | |
| 740M vs 750M | ||
 | VS | |
| $576 | ||
| 660 vs 750M | ||
 | VS | |
| 650M vs 750M | ||
 | VS | |
| 940MX vs 750M | ||
| | VS |  |
| 840M vs R7 M265 | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $273 | ||
| 1050 Ti vs 1060 | ||
| | VS |  |
| 1050 Ti vs 1050 | ||
| | VS |  |
| 1050 Ti vs 970 | ||
| | VS |  |
| 1050 Ti vs 960 | ||
| | VS | |
| $273 | ||
| 1060 vs 970 | ||
 | VS |  |
| 1080 Ti vs 1080 | ||
| | VS |  |
| 1050 vs RX 460 | ||
