Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Radeon R7 M265DX

Reasons to consider the
AMD Radeon R7 M265DX

Report a correction

GPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the AMD Radeon R7 M265DX vs the Nvidia GeForce 930MX.

Front view of GeForce 930MX

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce 930MX

Report a correction
Higher clock speed 1,019 MHz vs 780 MHz More than 30% higher clock speed
Higher turbo clock speed 1,176 MHz vs 855 MHz Around 40% higher turbo clock speed
Higher pixel rate 16.3 GPixel/s vs 6.24 GPixel/s More than 2.5x higher pixel rate
More render output processors 16 vs 8 Twice as many render output processors

Features Key features of the Radeon R7 M265DX  vs GeForce 930MX 

pixel rate Number of pixels a graphics card can render to the screen every second

Radeon R7 M265DX
6.24 GPixel/s
GeForce 930MX
16.3 GPixel/s

texture rate Speed at which a graphics card can perform texture mapping

Radeon R7 M265DX
15.6 GTexel/s
GeForce 930MX
24.46 GTexel/s

floating point performance How fast the gpu can crunch numbers

Radeon R7 M265DX
499.2 GFLOPS
GeForce 930MX
782.6 GFLOPS

shading units Subcomponents of the gpu, these run in parallel to enable fast pixel shading

texture mapping units Built into each gpu, these resize and rotate bitmaps for texturing scenes

render output processors GPU commponents responsible for transform pixels as they flow between memory buffers

Specifications Full list of technical specs


Radeon R7 M265DX  vs
GeForce 930MX 
GPU brand AMD Nvidia
GPU name Jet GM108
Clock speed 780 MHz 1,019 MHz
Turbo clock speed 855 MHz 1,176 MHz
Is dual GPU No No
Reference card None None

raw performance

Radeon R7 M265DX  vs
GeForce 930MX 
Shading units 320 384
Texture mapping units 20 24
Render output processors 8 16
Pixel rate 6.24 GPixel/s 16.3 GPixel/s
Texture rate 15.6 GTexel/s 24.46 GTexel/s
Floating-point performance 499.2 GFLOPS 782.6 GFLOPS


comments powered by Disqus