Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Radeon R7 M265DX

Reasons to consider the
AMD Radeon R7 M265DX

Report a correction

GPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the AMD Radeon R7 M265DX vs the Nvidia GeForce GTX 660M.

Front view of GeForce GTX 660M

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX 660M

Report a correction
More render output processors 16 vs 8 Twice as many render output processors
Higher turbo clock speed 950 MHz vs 855 MHz More than 10% higher turbo clock speed

Features Key features of the Radeon R7 M265DX  vs GeForce GTX 660M 

pixel rate Number of pixels a graphics card can render to the screen every second

Radeon R7 M265DX
6.24 GPixel/s
GeForce GTX 660M
6.68 GPixel/s

texture rate Speed at which a graphics card can perform texture mapping

Radeon R7 M265DX
15.6 GTexel/s
GeForce GTX 660M
26.72 GTexel/s

floating point performance How fast the gpu can crunch numbers

Radeon R7 M265DX
499.2 GFLOPS
GeForce GTX 660M
641.3 GFLOPS

shading units Subcomponents of the gpu, these run in parallel to enable fast pixel shading

texture mapping units Built into each gpu, these resize and rotate bitmaps for texturing scenes

render output processors GPU commponents responsible for transform pixels as they flow between memory buffers

Specifications Full list of technical specs


Radeon R7 M265DX  vs
GeForce GTX 660M 
GPU brand AMD Nvidia
GPU name Jet GK107
Clock speed 780 MHz 835 MHz
Turbo clock speed 855 MHz 950 MHz
Is dual GPU No No
Reference card None None

raw performance

Radeon R7 M265DX  vs
GeForce GTX 660M 
Shading units 320 384
Texture mapping units 20 32
Render output processors 8 16
Pixel rate 6.24 GPixel/s 6.68 GPixel/s
Texture rate 15.6 GTexel/s 26.72 GTexel/s
Floating-point performance 499.2 GFLOPS 641.3 GFLOPS


comments powered by Disqus