Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Radeon R7 M265DX

Reasons to consider the
AMD Radeon R7 M265DX

Report a correction

GPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Radeon R7 M265DX vs the Radeon HD 7950.

Front view of Radeon HD 7950

Reasons to consider the
AMD Radeon HD 7950

Report a correction
Better floating-point performance 2,867.2 GFLOPS vs 499.2 GFLOPS Around 5.8x better floating-point performance
Higher texture rate 89.6 GTexel/s vs 15.6 GTexel/s Around 5.8x higher texture rate
Significantly more shading units 1,792 vs 320 1472 more shading units
Significantly more texture mapping units 112 vs 20 92 more texture mapping units
Higher pixel rate 25.6 GPixel/s vs 6.24 GPixel/s More than 4x higher pixel rate
More render output processors 32 vs 8 24 more render output processors
Significantly more compute units 28 vs 5 23 more compute units

Features Key features of the Radeon R7 M265DX  vs HD 7950 

pixel rate Number of pixels a graphics card can render to the screen every second

Radeon R7 M265DX
6.24 GPixel/s
Radeon HD 7950
25.6 GPixel/s

texture rate Speed at which a graphics card can perform texture mapping

Radeon R7 M265DX
15.6 GTexel/s
Radeon HD 7950
89.6 GTexel/s

floating point performance How fast the gpu can crunch numbers

Radeon R7 M265DX
499.2 GFLOPS
Radeon HD 7950
2,867.2 GFLOPS

shading units Subcomponents of the gpu, these run in parallel to enable fast pixel shading

texture mapping units Built into each gpu, these resize and rotate bitmaps for texturing scenes

compute units Discrete cores within the GPU

Specifications Full list of technical specs


Radeon R7 M265DX  vs
HD 7950 
GPU name Jet Tahiti PRO
Clock speed 780 MHz 800 MHz
Is dual GPU No No
Reference card None None

raw performance

Radeon R7 M265DX  vs
HD 7950 
Shading units 320 1,792
Texture mapping units 20 112
Render output processors 8 32
Compute units 5 28
Pixel rate 6.24 GPixel/s 25.6 GPixel/s
Texture rate 15.6 GTexel/s 89.6 GTexel/s
Floating-point performance 499.2 GFLOPS 2,867.2 GFLOPS


comments powered by Disqus