Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Radeon R8 M435DX

Reasons to consider the
AMD Radeon R8 M435DX

Report a correction

GPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the AMD Radeon R8 M435DX vs the Nvidia GeForce GTX 950M.

Front view of GeForce GTX 950M

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX 950M

Report a correction
More render output processors 16 vs 8 Twice as many render output processors
Higher turbo clock speed 1,124 MHz vs 1,030 MHz Around 10% higher turbo clock speed
Slightly more shading units 640 vs 384 256 more shading units
Slightly more texture mapping units 40 vs 24 16 more texture mapping units

Features Key features of the Radeon R8 M435DX  vs GeForce GTX 950M 

pixel rate Number of pixels a graphics card can render to the screen every second

Radeon R8 M435DX
8.24 GPixel/s
GeForce GTX 950M
15.89 GPixel/s

texture rate Speed at which a graphics card can perform texture mapping

Radeon R8 M435DX
24.72 GTexel/s
GeForce GTX 950M
39.7 GTexel/s

floating point performance How fast the gpu can crunch numbers

Radeon R8 M435DX
791 GFLOPS
GeForce GTX 950M
1,271 GFLOPS

shading units Subcomponents of the gpu, these run in parallel to enable fast pixel shading

texture mapping units Built into each gpu, these resize and rotate bitmaps for texturing scenes

render output processors GPU commponents responsible for transform pixels as they flow between memory buffers

Specifications Full list of technical specs

gpu

Radeon R8 M435DX  vs
GeForce GTX 950M 
GPU brand AMD Nvidia
GPU name Jet GM107
Clock speed 955 MHz 993 MHz
Turbo clock speed 1,030 MHz 1,124 MHz
Is dual GPU No No
Reference card None None

raw performance

Radeon R8 M435DX  vs
GeForce GTX 950M 
Shading units 384 640
Texture mapping units 24 40
Render output processors 8 16
Pixel rate 8.24 GPixel/s 15.89 GPixel/s
Texture rate 24.72 GTexel/s 39.7 GTexel/s
Floating-point performance 791 GFLOPS 1,271 GFLOPS

Comments

comments powered by Disqus