Winner
AMD Radeon R9 270
GPUBoss recommends the AMD Radeon R9 270 based on its benchmarks.
See full details Radeon R9 270 vs GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost |
Released November, 2013
AMD Radeon R9 270
- 900 MHz
- 2 GB GDDR5
7.6 Out of 10
by techPowerUp!GPU overclocking potential is quite good, even with the ASUS card being overclocked out of the box already.
VS
Released March, 2013
Generic GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
- 1 GHz
- 2 GB GDDR5
7.3 Out of 10
by techPowerUp! (Apr, 2013)In this review, we test the EVGA GTX 650 Ti Boost SuperClocked, which, as the name suggests, is overclocked out of the box to a base clock frequency of 1072 MHz; quite a large increase over the 980 MHz of the reference design.
GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of R9 270 vs 650 Ti Boost among Desktop GPUs
Gaming | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more | |
Graphics | |
| | |
| T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more | |
Computing | |
| | |
| Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more | |
Performance per Watt | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more | |
Value | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more | |
Noise and Power | |
| | |
| TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more | |
| 7.6 | Overall Score |
| | |
 | Winner |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?
VS
AMD Radeon R9 270GPUBoss Winner |  | |
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Better PassMark score | 4,256 | vs | 2,668 | Around 60% better PassMark score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Higher memory bandwidth | 179.2 GB/s | vs | 146.6 GB/s | More than 20% higher memory bandwidth | |||
| Better floating-point performance | 2,368 GFLOPS | vs | 1,545.2 GFLOPS | Around 55% better floating-point performance | |||
| Higher pixel rate | 29.6 GPixel/s | vs | 16.1 GPixel/s | Around 85% higher pixel rate | |||
| Significantly higher crysis 3 framerate | 74 | vs | 47 | More than 55% higher crysis 3 framerate | |||
| More shading units | 1,280 | vs | 768 | 512 more shading units | |||
| More render output processors | 32 | vs | 24 | 8 more render output processors | |||
| Better fire strike factor score | 60.28 | vs | 47.81 | More than 25% better fire strike factor score | |||
| Slightly more texture mapping units | 80 | vs | 64 | 16 more texture mapping units | |||
| |||||||
| Higher clock speed | 1,006 MHz | vs | 900 MHz | More than 10% higher clock speed | |||
| Slightly higher effective memory clock speed | 6,108 MHz | vs | 5,600 MHz | Around 10% higher effective memory clock speed | |||
| Higher turbo clock speed | 1,072 MHz | vs | 925 MHz | More than 15% higher turbo clock speed | |||
| Higher memory clock speed | 1,527 MHz | vs | 1,400 MHz | Around 10% higher memory clock speed | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of Radeon R9 270 vs GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench
Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench
T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench
Manhattan (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench
Fire Strike Factor Data courtesy FutureMark
Sky Diver Factor Data courtesy FutureMark
Crysis 3
FarCry 3
Reviews Word on the street
| Radeon R9 270 | vs | GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost | ||
 | GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| R9 270 vs 750 Ti | ||
| | VS |  |
| R9 270 vs R7 370 | ||
| | VS |  |
| R9 270 vs 960 | ||
| | VS |  |
| R9 270 vs 950 | ||
| | VS |  |
| R9 270 vs 7870 | ||
| | VS |  |
| R9 270 vs 760 | ||
| | VS |  |
| R9 270 vs RX 460 | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| 970 vs 1060 | ||
 | VS | |
| $340 | ||
| RX 480 vs 1060 | ||
| | VS | |
| 750 Ti vs 950 | ||
| | VS | |
| 950 vs RX 460 | ||
| | VS | |
| 960 vs 1060 | ||
 | VS |  |
| 960M vs 950M | ||
| | VS | |
| 750 Ti vs RX 460 | ||
Read more
Comments
Showing 2 comments.
