GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of R9 270 vs 650 Ti Boost among Desktop GPUs

Gaming

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more

Graphics

T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more

Computing

Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more

Performance per Watt

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Value

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Noise and Power

TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more

Winner
AMD Radeon R9 270 

GPUBoss recommends the AMD Radeon R9 270  based on its benchmarks and compute performance.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

AMD Radeon R9 270

GPUBoss Winner
Front view of Radeon R9 270

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Radeon R9 270

Reasons to consider the
AMD Radeon R9 270

Report a correction
Better PassMark score 4,248 vs 2,668 Around 60% better PassMark score
Higher memory bandwidth 179.2 GB/s vs 144.2 GB/s Around 25% higher memory bandwidth
Better floating-point performance 2,304 GFLOPS vs 1,545 GFLOPS Around 50% better floating-point performance
Higher pixel rate 28.8 GPixel/s vs 16.1 GPixel/s Around 80% higher pixel rate
Significantly higher FarCry 3 framerate 60 vs 35 More than 70% higher FarCry 3 framerate
Better manhattan score 3,717.7 vs 3,397.11 Around 10% better manhattan score
Better ocean surface simulation score 1,298.8 frames/s vs 878.96 frames/s Around 50% better ocean surface simulation score
Better sky diver factor score 317.34 vs 256.75 Around 25% better sky diver factor score
More shading units 1,280 vs 768 512 more shading units
Slightly more render output processors 32 vs 24 8 more render output processors
Better PassMark direct compute score 2,211 vs 1,597 Around 40% better PassMark direct compute score
Front view of GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost

Reasons to consider the
Generic GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost

Report a correction
Higher clock speed 1,006 MHz vs 900 MHz More than 10% higher clock speed
Higher turbo clock speed 1,072 MHz vs 925 MHz More than 15% higher turbo clock speed
Slightly higher effective memory clock speed 6,108 MHz vs 5,600 MHz Around 10% higher effective memory clock speed
Higher memory clock speed 1,527 MHz vs 1,400 MHz Around 10% higher memory clock speed

Benchmarks Real world tests of Radeon R9 270 vs GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost

Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon R9 270
293.29 mHash/s
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
48.24 mHash/s

Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon R9 270
57.24 mPixels/s
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
25.2 mPixels/s

T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

Manhattan (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

Fire Strike Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Sky Diver Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Reviews Word on the street

Radeon R9 270  vs GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost 

9.2
9.6
Gaming noise is much improved too, which should result in a really quiet gaming experience.
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost

Comments

Showing 2 comments.
It does though not by much. When the 650 ti boost was first out it was 150 which is cheaper than the r9. for whatever reason now I can't find it very cheap at all so the R9 makes more sense.
radeon will win
comments powered by Disqus