GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of R9 270 vs 650 Ti Boost

Gaming

Real world tests using the latest 3D games
Radeon R9 270
N/A
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
N/A
crysis: warhead (2013), Crysis: Warhead (2012), Batman: Arkham City and 6 more

Benchmarks

Synthetic tests to measure overall performance
Radeon R9 270
7.3
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
6.5
Passmark

Compute Performance

General computing tests executed on the GPU
Radeon R9 270
7.3
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
6.5
Passmark Direct Compute

Noise and Power

How loud and hot does the card run idle and under load
Radeon R9 270
5.6
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
5.6
TDP

GPUBoss Score

Gaming, Benchmarks, Compute Performance and Noise and Power
Radeon R9 270
7.2
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
6.5

Winner
AMD Radeon R9 270 

GPUBoss recommends the AMD Radeon R9 270  based on its .

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

AMD Radeon R9 270

GPUBoss Winner
 Front view of Radeon R9 270
Front view of GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost

Generic GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost

Join the discussion

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Radeon R9 270

Reasons to consider the
AMD Radeon R9 270

Report a correction
Better passmark score 4,211 vs 2,705 More than 55% better passmark score
Higher pixel rate 28.8 GPixel/s vs 16.1 GPixel/s Around 80% higher pixel rate
Better floating-point performance 2,304 GFLOPS vs 1,545 GFLOPS Around 50% better floating-point performance
Higher memory bandwidth 179.2 GB/s vs 144.2 GB/s Around 25% higher memory bandwidth
More shading units 1,280 vs 768 512 more shading units
More render output processors 32 vs 24 8 more render output processors
Better passmark direct compute score 2,151 vs 1,448 Around 50% better passmark direct compute score
Wider memory bus 256 bit vs 192 bit Around 35% wider memory bus
Front view of GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost

Reasons to consider the
Generic GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost

Report a correction
Higher clock speed 1,006 MHz vs 900 MHz More than 10% higher clock speed
Significantly higher turbo clock speed 1,072 MHz vs 925 MHz More than 15% higher turbo clock speed
Higher effective memory clock speed 6,108 MHz vs 5,600 MHz Around 10% higher effective memory clock speed
Higher memory clock speed 1,527 MHz vs 1,400 MHz Around 10% higher memory clock speed

Benchmarks Real world tests of Radeon R9 270 vs GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost

Passmark Industry standard benchmark for overall graphics card performance

Radeon R9 270
4,211
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
2,705
videocardbenchmark.net
3DMark 11, as the name might suggest, makes use of the Microsoft DirectX 11 API and puts every feature of it to use, creating astonishingly realistic visuals.
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost | by techPowerUp! (Mar, 2013)

Passmark Direct Compute Measures performance of general-purpose computing using Microsoft DirectCompute

Radeon R9 270
2,151
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
1,448
videocardbenchmark.net

Reviews Word on the street

Radeon R9 270  vs GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost 
9.2
read review
9.6
read review
Gaming noise is much improved too, which should result in a really quiet gaming experience.
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost

Comments

Showing 2 comments.
zayahv2 (10:49 AM, June 29, 2014)
It does though not by much. When the 650 ti boost was first out it was 150 which is cheaper than the r9. for whatever reason now I can't find it very cheap at all so the R9 makes more sense.
bharathi (03:14 AM, February 18, 2014)
radeon will win
comments powered by Disqus

features

information

  • terms and privacy
  • about
  • blog

on the web

GPUBoss
Rebellion Media Technology