Winner
AMD Radeon R9 270
GPUBoss recommends the AMD Radeon R9 270 based on its benchmarks and compute performance.
See full details Radeon R9 270 vs HD 7850 |
Released November, 2013
AMD Radeon R9 270
- 900 MHz
- 2 GB GDDR5
6.9 Out of 10
by techPowerUp!GPU overclocking potential is quite good, even with the ASUS card being overclocked out of the box already.
VS
Released March, 2012
AMD Radeon HD 7850
- 860 MHz
- 2 GB GDDR5
7.2 Out of 10
by techPowerUp! (Mar, 2012)This power configuration is good for up to 225 W of power draw for the former and 150 W for the latter.
GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of R9 270 vs 7850 among Desktop GPUs
Gaming | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more | |
Graphics | |
| | |
| T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more | |
Computing | |
| | |
| Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more | |
Performance per Watt | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more | |
Value | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more | |
Noise and Power | |
| | |
| TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more | |
| 7.2 | Overall Score |
| | |
 | Winner |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?
VS
AMD Radeon R9 270GPUBoss Winner |  | |
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Higher memory bandwidth | 179.2 GB/s | vs | 153.6 GB/s | More than 15% higher memory bandwidth | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Higher effective memory clock speed | 5,600 MHz | vs | 4,800 MHz | More than 15% higher effective memory clock speed | |||
| Significantly higher crysis 3 framerate | 74 | vs | 35 | More than 2x higher crysis 3 framerate | |||
| Slightly better floating-point performance | 2,368 GFLOPS | vs | 1,761.3 GFLOPS | Around 35% better floating-point performance | |||
| Slightly higher texture rate | 74 GTexel/s | vs | 55 GTexel/s | Around 35% higher texture rate | |||
| Slightly more shading units | 1,280 | vs | 1,024 | 256 more shading units | |||
| Slightly more texture mapping units | 80 | vs | 64 | 16 more texture mapping units | |||
| Higher memory clock speed | 1,400 MHz | vs | 1,200 MHz | More than 15% higher memory clock speed | |||
| Slightly better fire strike factor score | 49.6 | vs | 43.94 | Around 15% better fire strike factor score | |||
| Slightly better face detection score | 57.24 mPixels/s | vs | 45.93 mPixels/s | Around 25% better face detection score | |||
| |||||||
| Lower TDP | 130W | vs | 150W | Around 15% lower TDP | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of Radeon R9 270 vs HD 7850
Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench
Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench
Ocean surface simulation Data courtesy CompuBench
T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench
Manhattan (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench
Fire Strike Factor Data courtesy FutureMark
Sky Diver Factor Data courtesy FutureMark
Crysis 3
Reviews Word on the street
| Radeon R9 270 | vs | HD 7850 | ||
 | Radeon R9 270 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| 7850 vs 750 Ti | ||
| | VS |  |
| $576 | ||
| 7850 vs 660 | ||
| | VS |  |
| 7850 vs 1050 Ti | ||
| | VS |  |
| 7850 vs 1050 | ||
 | VS | |
| R9 270 vs 750 Ti | ||
| | VS | |
| R9 270 vs 1050 Ti | ||
| | VS | |
| R9 270 vs 1050 | ||
Popular Comparisons
| | VS | |
| 1050 vs 1050 Ti | ||
 | VS | |
| $323 | ||
| 1060 vs 1050 Ti | ||
 | VS | |
| 970 vs 1050 Ti | ||
| | VS | |
| $323 | ||
| 970 vs 1060 | ||
 | VS |  |
| RX Vega 64 vs 1080 Ti | ||
 | VS | |
| 960 vs 1050 Ti | ||
 | VS | |
| 1080 vs 1080 Ti | ||
