GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of R9 270X vs 1060 among Desktop GPUs

Gaming

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more

Graphics

T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more

Computing

Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more

Performance per Watt

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Value

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Noise and Power

TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more

7.1

Overall Score

Winner
MSI GeForce GTX 1060 

GPUBoss recommends the MSI GeForce GTX 1060  based on its benchmarks, compute performance and noise and power.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS
Front view of GeForce GTX 1060

MSI GeForce GTX 1060

GPUBoss Winner

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Radeon R9 270X

Reasons to consider the
Sapphire Radeon R9 270X

Report a correction
Wider memory bus 256 bit vs 192 bit Around 35% wider memory bus
Front view of GeForce GTX 1060

Reasons to consider the
MSI GeForce GTX 1060

Report a correction
Significantly better PassMark score 8,686 vs 4,658 More than 85% better PassMark score
Significantly higher clock speed 1,544 MHz vs 1,100 MHz More than 40% higher clock speed
Significantly more memory 6,144 MB vs 2,048 MB 3x more memory
Significantly higher effective memory clock speed 8,008 MHz vs 6,000 MHz Around 35% higher effective memory clock speed
Significantly higher pixel rate 74.1 GPixel/s vs 36.8 GPixel/s More than 2x higher pixel rate
Much higher turbo clock speed 1,759 MHz vs 1,150 MHz Around 55% higher turbo clock speed
Better floating-point performance 3,953 GFLOPS vs 2,944 GFLOPS Around 35% better floating-point performance
Much better PassMark direct compute score 5,049 vs 1,062 More than 4.8x better PassMark direct compute score
Significantly better T-Rex score 8.68 frames/s vs 4.36 frames/s Around 2x better T-Rex score
Higher texture rate 123.5 GTexel/s vs 92 GTexel/s Around 35% higher texture rate
More render output processors 48 vs 32 16 more render output processors
Significantly higher memory clock speed 2,002 MHz vs 1,500 MHz Around 35% higher memory clock speed
Lower TDP 120W vs 180W Around 35% lower TDP

Benchmarks Real world tests of Radeon R9 270X vs GeForce GTX 1060

Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon R9 270X
251.26 mHash/s
GeForce GTX 1060
576.4 mHash/s

Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon R9 270X
57.24 mPixels/s
GeForce GTX 1060
119.24 mPixels/s

Ocean surface simulation Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon R9 270X
1,298.8 frames/s
GeForce GTX 1060
1,766.73 frames/s

Particle simulation Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon R9 270X
340.91 mInteraction/s
GeForce GTX 1060
1,196.96 mInteraction/s

T-Rex (Compubench 1.5) Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon R9 270X
4.36 frames/s
GeForce GTX 1060
8.68 frames/s

Video composition Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon R9 270X
80.7 frames/s
GeForce GTX 1060
21.91 frames/s

T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon R9 270X
3,353.98
GeForce GTX 1060
3,358.86

Manhattan (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon R9 270X
3,713.26
GeForce GTX 1060
3,717.62

Comments

comments powered by Disqus