GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of R9 270X vs 550 Ti


Real world tests using the latest 3D games

crysis: warhead (2013), Crysis: Warhead (2012), Batman: Arkham City and 6 more


Synthetic tests to measure overall performance

PassMark, 3DMark 11 Graphics, 3DMark Vantage Graphics and 3DMark06

Compute Performance

General computing tests executed on the GPU

PassMark Direct Compute

Noise and Power

How loud and hot does the card run idle and under load


GPUBoss Score

Gaming, Benchmarks, Compute Performance and Noise and Power

Sapphire Radeon R9 270X 

GPUBoss recommends the Sapphire Radeon R9 270X  based on its benchmarks and compute performance.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Radeon R9 270X

Reasons to consider the
Sapphire Radeon R9 270X

Report a correction
Much better 3DMark06 score 23,610 vs 2,272 Around 10.5x better 3DMark06 score
Significantly better 3DMark vantage graphics score 28,000 vs 9,923 More than 2.8x better 3DMark vantage graphics score
Significantly higher clock speed 1,100 MHz vs 900 MHz More than 20% higher clock speed
Better PassMark score 4,568 vs 1,923 Around 2.5x better PassMark score
Higher effective memory clock speed 6,000 MHz vs 4,104 MHz More than 45% higher effective memory clock speed
Better floating-point performance 2,816 GFLOPS vs 691.2 GFLOPS More than 4x better floating-point performance
Significantly higher texture rate 88 GTexel/s vs 28.8 GTexel/s More than 3x higher texture rate
Higher pixel rate 35.2 GPixel/s vs 7.2 GPixel/s Around 5x higher pixel rate
More memory 2,048 MB vs 1,024 MB 2x more memory
More shading units 1,280 vs 192 1088 more shading units
Significantly higher memory clock speed 1,500 MHz vs 1,026 MHz More than 45% higher memory clock speed
Significantly higher battlefield 3 framerate 84.3 fps vs 31.4 fps Around 2.8x higher battlefield 3 framerate
More texture mapping units 80 vs 32 48 more texture mapping units
Better manhattan score 3,717.76 vs 3,539.52 More than 5% better manhattan score
Better PassMark direct compute score 2,427 vs 795 More than 3x better PassMark direct compute score
Slightly more render output processors 32 vs 24 8 more render output processors
Front view of GeForce GTX 550 Ti

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX 550 Ti

Report a correction
Better 3DMark 11 graphics score 15,553 vs 8,520 Around 85% better 3DMark 11 graphics score
Lower TDP 116W vs 180W More than 35% lower TDP

Benchmarks Real world tests of Radeon R9 270X vs GeForce GTX 550 Ti

PassMark Industry standard benchmark for overall graphics card performanceData courtesy Passmark

3DMark 11 Graphics Industry standard benchmark that tests DirectX 11 GPU performance

3DMark Vantage Graphics Industry standard benchmark that tests DirectX 10 GPU performance

GFXBench 3.0 (T-Rex)

GFXBench 3.0 (Manhattan)

PassMark Direct Compute Measures performance of general-purpose computing using Microsoft DirectCompute

Reviews Word on the street

Radeon R9 270X  vs GeForce GTX 550 Ti 

The 28 nm "Pitcairn" silicon, on which the Radeon R9 270X is based, features 1,280 stream processors based on the Graphics CoreNext micro-architecture, 80 texture memory units (TMUs), 32 raster operations units (ROPs), and a 256-bit wide GDDR5 memory interface, holding 2 GB of memory.
Radeon R9 270X


comments powered by Disqus