GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of R9 270X vs 560 Ti among Desktop GPUs


Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more


T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more


Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more

Performance per Watt

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more


Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Noise and Power

TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more


Overall Score

AMD Radeon R9 270X 

GPUBoss recommends the AMD Radeon R9 270X  based on its gaming, benchmarks and compute performance.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Radeon R9 270X

Reasons to consider the
AMD Radeon R9 270X

Report a correction
Significantly better 3DMark06 score 23,610 vs 16,518 Around 45% better 3DMark06 score
Better 3DMark vantage graphics score 28,000 vs 17,648 Around 60% better 3DMark vantage graphics score
Higher effective memory clock speed 5,600 MHz vs 4,200 MHz Around 35% higher effective memory clock speed
Better PassMark score 4,590 vs 3,534 Around 30% better PassMark score
Better 3DMark 11 graphics score 8,520 vs 4,013 More than 2x better 3DMark 11 graphics score
Higher clock speed 1,000 MHz vs 950 MHz More than 5% higher clock speed
More memory 2,048 MB vs 1,024 MB 2x more memory
Better floating-point performance 2,560 GFLOPS vs 1,459 GFLOPS More than 75% better floating-point performance
Higher pixel rate 32 GPixel/s vs 15.2 GPixel/s More than 2x higher pixel rate
More shading units 1,280 vs 384 896 more shading units
Better bitcoin mining score 293.29 mHash/s vs 87.15 mHash/s More than 3.2x better bitcoin mining score
Better fire strike factor score 62.39 vs 39.65 More than 55% better fire strike factor score
Significantly better civilization 5 texture decomposition (2013) score 310.9 vs 225.5 Around 40% better civilization 5 texture decomposition (2013) score
Higher texture rate 80 GTexel/s vs 60.8 GTexel/s More than 30% higher texture rate
Higher memory clock speed 1,400 MHz vs 1,050 MHz Around 35% higher memory clock speed
Higher battlefield 3 framerate 65 vs 52.5 Around 25% higher battlefield 3 framerate
Better PassMark direct compute score 2,466 vs 1,400 More than 75% better PassMark direct compute score
Higher battlefield 3 framerate 84.3 fps vs 57.3 fps More than 45% higher battlefield 3 framerate
Front view of GeForce GTX 560 Ti

Reasons to consider the
MSI GeForce GTX 560 Ti

Report a correction
Slightly lower TDP 170W vs 180W More than 5% lower TDP

Benchmarks Real world tests of Radeon R9 270X vs GeForce GTX 560 Ti

Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon R9 270X
293.29 mHash/s
GeForce GTX 560 Ti
87.15 mHash/s

Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon R9 270X
57.24 mPixels/s
GeForce GTX 560 Ti
30.7 mPixels/s

Ocean surface simulation Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon R9 270X
993.85 frames/s
GeForce GTX 560 Ti
814.96 frames/s

T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

Manhattan (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

Fire Strike Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Sky Diver Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Battlefield 3

Reviews Word on the street

Radeon R9 270X  vs GeForce GTX 560 Ti 

Considering the excellent cooling capabilities of the heatsink I see no reason why they didn't clock higher.
GeForce GTX 560 Ti


comments powered by Disqus