Winner
Nvidia GeForce GTX 660
GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce GTX 660 based on its compute performance and noise and power.
See full details | Radeon R9 270X vs GeForce GTX 660 |
Gaming | |
| |
Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more |
Graphics | |
| |
T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more |
Computing | |
| |
Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more |
Performance per Watt | |
| |
Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more |
Value | |
| |
Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more |
Noise and Power | |
| |
TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more |
6.5 | Overall Score |
| |
Winner |
| ![]() | Nvidia GeForce GTX 660GPUBoss Winner |
| |||||||
Higher clock speed | 1,100 MHz | vs | 823 MHz | Around 35% higher clock speed | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Significantly better 3DMark06 score | 23,610 | vs | 18,060 | More than 30% better 3DMark06 score | |||
Better floating-point performance | 2,944 GFLOPS | vs | 1,896.2 GFLOPS | More than 55% better floating-point performance | |||
Slightly better 3DMark 11 graphics score | 8,520 | vs | 6,850 | Around 25% better 3DMark 11 graphics score | |||
Better 3DMark vantage graphics score | 28,000 | vs | 25,130 | More than 10% better 3DMark vantage graphics score | |||
Higher pixel rate | 36.8 GPixel/s | vs | 19.75 GPixel/s | More than 85% higher pixel rate | |||
Higher effective memory clock speed | 6,000 MHz | vs | 5,600 MHz | More than 5% higher effective memory clock speed | |||
Higher turbo clock speed | 1,150 MHz | vs | 888 MHz | Around 30% higher turbo clock speed | |||
Better video composition score | 80.7 frames/s | vs | 35.42 frames/s | More than 2.2x better video composition score | |||
Significantly higher battlefield 3 framerate | 65 | vs | 50 | 30% higher battlefield 3 framerate | |||
Better fire strike factor score | 51.83 | vs | 44.27 | More than 15% better fire strike factor score | |||
Higher memory clock speed | 1,500 MHz | vs | 1,400 MHz | More than 5% higher memory clock speed | |||
| |||||||
Significantly better manhattan score | 12,983.16 | vs | 3,713.26 | Around 3.5x better manhattan score | |||
More texture mapping units | 96 | vs | 80 | 16 more texture mapping units | |||
Better PassMark direct compute score | 1,948 | vs | 1,062 | Around 85% better PassMark direct compute score | |||
Lower TDP | 130W | vs | 180W | Around 30% lower TDP |
Radeon R9 270X | vs | GeForce GTX 660 | ||
![]() | 9.0 | 9.0 |
---|
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$274 | ||
750 Ti vs R9 270X | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
960 vs R9 270X | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
760 vs R9 270X | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$274 | $200 | |
750 Ti vs 660 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$200 | ||
1050 vs 660 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$200 | ||
1050 Ti vs 660 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$200 | ||
940MX vs 660 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$304 | ||
1050 Ti vs 1060 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
1050 Ti vs 970 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$304 | ||
1060 vs 970 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
960 vs 970 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
1050 Ti vs 960 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$274 | ||
960 vs 750 Ti | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
R9 390 vs 970 | ||