Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Radeon R9 270X

Reasons to consider the
Sapphire Radeon R9 270X

Report a correction
Much better 3DMark06 score 23,610 vs 5,378 Around 4.5x better 3DMark06 score
Higher clock speed 1,100 MHz vs 1,020 MHz Around 10% higher clock speed
Better 3DMark vantage graphics score 28,000 vs 20,401 More than 35% better 3DMark vantage graphics score
Better passmark score 4,510 vs 3,696 More than 20% better passmark score
Higher pixel rate 35.2 GPixel/s vs 16.32 GPixel/s Around 2.2x higher pixel rate
Better floating-point performance 2,816 GFLOPS vs 1,728 GFLOPS Around 65% better floating-point performance
Higher effective memory clock speed 6,000 MHz vs 5,400 MHz More than 10% higher effective memory clock speed
More render output processors 32 vs 16 Twice as many render output processors
More shading units 1,280 vs 640 Twice as many shading units
Higher turbo clock speed 1,150 MHz vs 1,085 MHz More than 5% higher turbo clock speed
More texture mapping units 80 vs 40 Twice as many texture mapping units
Wider memory bus 256 bit vs 128 bit 2x wider memory bus
Better passmark direct compute score 2,368 vs 1,676 More than 40% better passmark direct compute score
Higher BioShock infinite framerate 55.1 fps vs 46.7 fps Around 20% higher BioShock infinite framerate
Front view of GeForce GTX 750 Ti

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti

Report a correction

GPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti vs the Sapphire Radeon R9 270X.

Benchmarks Real world tests of Radeon R9 270X vs GeForce GTX 750 Ti

Passmark Industry standard benchmark for overall graphics card performance

3DMark Vantage Graphics Industry standard benchmark that tests DirectX 10 GPU performance

3DMark06 Industry standard benchmark that tests DirectX 9 GPU performance

BioShock Infinite 1920 x 1080 - Ultra preset + DX11 (DDOF)

Crysis 3 1920 x 1080 - Very High preset + 16xAF + 2xSMAA

Passmark Direct Compute Measures performance of general-purpose computing using Microsoft DirectCompute

Reviews Word on the street

Radeon R9 270X  vs GeForce GTX 750 Ti 

The 28 nm "Pitcairn" silicon, on which the Radeon R9 270X is based, features 1,280 stream processors based on the Graphics CoreNext micro-architecture, 80 texture memory units (TMUs), 32 raster operations units (ROPs), and a 256-bit wide GDDR5 memory interface, holding 2 GB of memory.
Radeon R9 270X

Read more


Showing 5 comments.
It's pretty obvious, R9 270x is a big winner here yet they fail to declare it. Any other test where Nvidia has even the slightest advantage shows Nvidia as the winner. Hmmm....... Anyone want a double dose of bias?
Worthless comparison. R9 270X is way better.
These numbers on this website are hardly correct for many different cards and DOES FAVOR geforce in their results overall. GPUBOSS is undependable I would go with Hard ware compare you can type hwcompare on yahoo or google (if you like goverment owned crap sites)
I'd like to see a section for Power Consumption, although I know it can be hard to obtain, Tom's Hardware seems to do a great job of getting that data, and you could use theirs!
comments powered by Disqus