0 Comments
| | Radeon R9 280X vs GeForce GTX 750 Ti |
Released October, 2013
Generic Radeon R9 280X
- 850 MHz
- 3 GB GDDR5
by techPowerUp!AMD's Tahiti graphics processor was the first chip to use the GCN shader architecture.
VS
Released February, 2014
Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti
- 1 GHz
- 2 GB GDDR5
by techPowerUp!We also reviewed cards with custom coolers from board partners today, and their cards improve on these noise levels some more, which makes the GTX 750 Ti an excellent choice if you don't need much gaming performance, but want a very quiet experience.
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Much better 3DMark06 score | 28,452 | vs | 5,378 | More than 5.2x better 3DMark06 score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Significantly better 3DMark vantage graphics score | 36,241 | vs | 20,401 | Around 80% better 3DMark vantage graphics score | |||
| Better floating-point performance | 3,482 GFLOPS | vs | 1,728 GFLOPS | More than 2x better floating-point performance | |||
| More memory | 3,072 MB | vs | 2,048 MB | 50% more memory | |||
| Significantly more shading units | 2,048 | vs | 640 | 1408 more shading units | |||
| Higher effective memory clock speed | 6,000 MHz | vs | 5,400 MHz | More than 10% higher effective memory clock speed | |||
| More texture mapping units | 128 | vs | 40 | 88 more texture mapping units | |||
| Higher pixel rate | 27.2 GPixel/s | vs | 16.32 GPixel/s | More than 65% higher pixel rate | |||
| Significantly wider memory bus | 384 bit | vs | 128 bit | 3x wider memory bus | |||
| More render output processors | 32 | vs | 16 | Twice as many render output processors | |||
| Significantly higher BioShock infinite framerate | 73.9 fps | vs | 46.7 fps | Around 60% higher BioShock infinite framerate | |||
| Higher crysis 3 framerate | 38.5 fps | vs | 20.4 fps | Around 90% higher crysis 3 framerate | |||
| |||||||
| Significantly higher clock speed | 1,020 MHz | vs | 850 MHz | 20% higher clock speed | |||
| Higher turbo clock speed | 1,085 MHz | vs | 1,000 MHz | Around 10% higher turbo clock speed | |||
Benchmarks Real world tests of Radeon R9 280X vs GeForce GTX 750 Ti
3DMark Vantage Graphics Industry standard benchmark that tests DirectX 10 GPU performance
Radeon R9 280X
36,241
GeForce GTX 750 Ti
20,401
3DMark06 Industry standard benchmark that tests DirectX 9 GPU performance
Radeon R9 280X
28,452
GeForce GTX 750 Ti
5,378
BioShock Infinite 1920 x 1080 - Ultra preset + DX11 (DDOF)
Radeon R9 280X
73.9 fps
GeForce GTX 750 Ti
46.7 fps
Crysis 3 1920 x 1080 - Very High preset + 16xAF + 2xSMAA
Radeon R9 280X
38.5 fps
GeForce GTX 750 Ti
20.4 fps
GeForce GTX 750 Ti | by techPowerUp!After the tremendous success of Far Cry, the German game studio Crytek released their shooter Crysis in 2007.
Reviews Word on the street
| Radeon R9 280X | vs | GeForce GTX 750 Ti | ||
| 8.5 | 9.0 | GeForce GTX 750 Ti | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
| VS | |
| R9 280X vs 770 | ||
| VS | |
| R9 280X vs 760 | ||
| VS | |
| R9 280X vs 970 | ||
| VS | |
| 750 Ti vs 660 | ||
| VS | |
| 750 Ti vs 760 | ||
| VS | |
| 750 Ti vs R9 270X | ||
| VS | |
| 750 Ti vs R7 260X | ||
Popular Comparisons
| VS | |
| 780 vs 970 | ||
| VS | |
| 780 Ti vs 980 | ||
| VS | |
| 780 Ti vs 970 | ||
| VS | |
| 770 vs 970 | ||
| VS | |
| R9 290X vs 970 | ||
| VS | |
| 760 vs R9 270X | ||
| VS | |
| 770 vs R9 280X | ||
Read more
Comments
Showing 2 comments.
nicholas weibel (11:14 AM, August 16, 2014)
Wtfisthisbullshit (05:51 AM, August 9, 2014)





