GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of R9 280X vs 750 Ti Fake Card among Desktop GPUs

Gaming

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more

Graphics

T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more

Computing

Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more

Performance per Watt

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Value

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Noise and Power

TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more

Winner
Radeon R9 280X 

GPUBoss recommends the Radeon R9 280X  based on its benchmarks and compute performance.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Radeon R9 280X

Reasons to consider the
Generic Radeon R9 280X

Report a correction
Much better 3DMark06 score 28,452 vs 1,887.5 More than 15x better 3DMark06 score
Much higher memory bandwidth 288 GB/s vs 57.73 GB/s Around 5x higher memory bandwidth
Significantly better PassMark score 5,809 vs 1,557 Around 3.8x better PassMark score
Significantly better floating-point performance 4,096 GFLOPS vs 601.3 GFLOPS More than 6.8x better floating-point performance
Significantly higher effective memory clock speed 6,000 MHz vs 3,608 MHz More than 65% higher effective memory clock speed
Significantly higher texture rate 128 GTexel/s vs 25.06 GTexel/s More than 5x higher texture rate
Much better sky diver factor score 380.99 vs 115.77 More than 3.2x better sky diver factor score
Many more shading units 2,048 vs 192 1856 more shading units
Many more texture mapping units 128 vs 32 96 more texture mapping units
Much better bitcoin mining score 468.39 mHash/s vs 38.68 mHash/s More than 12x better bitcoin mining score
Higher pixel rate 32 GPixel/s vs 6.26 GPixel/s More than 5x higher pixel rate
More memory 3,072 MB vs 2,048 MB 50% more memory
Slightly better 3DMark vantage graphics score 11,255 vs 8,551 More than 30% better 3DMark vantage graphics score
Slightly higher clock speed 850 MHz vs 783 MHz Around 10% higher clock speed
Much better PassMark direct compute score 3,677 vs 716 Around 5.2x better PassMark direct compute score
Much higher memory clock speed 1,500 MHz vs 902 MHz More than 65% higher memory clock speed
Much wider memory bus 384 bit vs 128 bit 3x wider memory bus
More render output processors 32 vs 16 Twice as many render output processors
Front view of GeForce GTX 750 Ti Fake Card

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti Fake Card

Report a correction
Better 3DMark 11 graphics score 16,033.5 vs 10,792 Around 50% better 3DMark 11 graphics score
Much lower TDP 106W vs 250W 2.4x lower TDP

Benchmarks Real world tests of Radeon R9 280X vs GeForce GTX 750 Ti Fake Card

Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon R9 280X
468.39 mHash/s

Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon R9 280X
95.62 mPixels/s

Ocean surface simulation Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon R9 280X
1,924.31 frames/s

T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

Manhattan (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

Fire Strike Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Sky Diver Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Cloud Gate Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Comments

comments powered by Disqus