Winner
Radeon R9 280X
GPUBoss recommends the Radeon R9 280X based on its .
See full details| | Radeon R9 280X vs GeForce GTX 760 |
by techPowerUp!AMD's Tahiti graphics processor was the first chip to use the GCN shader architecture.
by techPowerUp!Palit has overclocked both GPU and memory on their GTX 760 JetStream out of the box, which provides a nice 6% performance improvement over the reference design.
Gaming | |
Real world tests using the latest 3D games | |
| Radeon R9 280X 8.7 GeForce GTX 760 8.6 | |
| battlefield 3 (2013) | |
Benchmarks | |
Synthetic tests to measure overall performance | |
| Radeon R9 280X 8.2 GeForce GTX 760 7.7 | |
| 3DMark 11 Graphics, 3DMark Vantage Graphics and 3DMark06 | |
Compute Performance | |
General computing tests executed on the GPU | |
| Radeon R9 280X 9.0 GeForce GTX 760 9.0 | |
| Civilization 5 Texture Decomposition (2013) | |
Noise and Power | |
How loud and hot does the card run idle and under load | |
| Radeon R9 280X 5.4 GeForce GTX 760 5.5 | |
| TDP | |
GPUBoss Score | |
Gaming, Benchmarks, Compute Performance and Noise and Power | |
| Radeon R9 280X 8.5 GeForce GTX 760 8.3 | |
Generic Radeon R9 280XGPUBoss Winner | | |
| |||||||
| Better 3DMark vantage graphics score | 36,241 | vs | 30,030 | More than 20% better 3DMark vantage graphics score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| More memory | 3,072 MB | vs | 2,048 MB | 50% more memory | |||
| Better floating-point performance | 3,482 GFLOPS | vs | 2,258 GFLOPS | Around 55% better floating-point performance | |||
| Better 3DMark06 score | 28,452 | vs | 24,480 | More than 15% better 3DMark06 score | |||
| Slightly better 3DMark 11 graphics score | 10,792 | vs | 8,730 | Around 25% better 3DMark 11 graphics score | |||
| More shading units | 2,048 | vs | 1,152 | 896 more shading units | |||
| More texture mapping units | 128 | vs | 96 | 32 more texture mapping units | |||
| Wider memory bus | 384 bit | vs | 256 bit | 50% wider memory bus | |||
| Slightly higher BioShock infinite framerate | 73.9 fps | vs | 68.2 fps | Around 10% higher BioShock infinite framerate | |||
| |||||||
| Higher clock speed | 980 MHz | vs | 850 MHz | More than 15% higher clock speed | |||
| Higher crysis 3 framerate | 58.7 fps | vs | 38.5 fps | More than 50% higher crysis 3 framerate | |||
| Slightly higher turbo clock speed | 1,032 MHz | vs | 1,000 MHz | Around 5% higher turbo clock speed | |||
| Lower TDP | 170W | vs | 250W | More than 30% lower TDP | |||
Radeon R9 280X | by techPowerUp!GPU Temperature ComparisonIdleLoadMSI R9 280X Gaming 6 GB40°C77°CMSI R9 280X Gaming 3 GB39°C87°CASUS R9 280X DC II32°C70°CASUS R9 280X Matrix38°C74°CSapphire R9 290X Tri-X OC36°C73°CGigabyte R9 280X OC34°C70°C Important: GPU temperature will vary depending on clock speed, voltage settings, cooler design, and production variances.
GeForce GTX 760 | by techPowerUp!Set decades after the events of Crysis 2, you wake up from a stasis pod to find long lost friend and squadmate "Psycho" who explains how C.E.L.L has virtually taken over the world by monopolizing energy production in Crysis 3.
| Radeon R9 280X | vs | GeForce GTX 760 | ||
| 8.5 | 9.0 | GeForce GTX 760 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|