0 Comments
| Radeon R9 280X vs HD 5770 X2 |
VS
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Much higher memory bandwidth | 288 GB/s | vs | 153.6 GB/s | Around 90% higher memory bandwidth | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Higher effective memory clock speed | 6,000 MHz | vs | 4,800 MHz | 25% higher effective memory clock speed | |||
Better floating-point performance | 4,096 GFLOPS | vs | 2,720 GFLOPS | More than 50% better floating-point performance | |||
Higher texture rate | 128 GTexel/s | vs | 68 GTexel/s | Around 90% higher texture rate | |||
More memory | 3,072 MB | vs | 2,048 MB | 50% more memory | |||
More texture mapping units | 128 | vs | 80 | 48 more texture mapping units | |||
More compute units | 32 | vs | 20 | 12 more compute units | |||
More shading units | 2,048 | vs | 1,600 | 448 more shading units | |||
Higher memory clock speed | 1,500 MHz | vs | 1,200 MHz | 25% higher memory clock speed | |||
Wider memory bus | 384 bit | vs | 256 bit | 50% wider memory bus | |||
| |||||||
Is dual GPU | Yes | vs | No | About half of graphics cards are dual GPU |
Features Key features of the Radeon R9 280X vs HD 5770 X2
memory bandwidth Rate at which data can be read from or stored in onboard memory
Radeon R9 280X
288 GB/s
Radeon HD 5770 X2
153.6 GB/s
pixel rate Number of pixels a graphics card can render to the screen every second
Radeon R9 280X
32 GPixel/s
Radeon HD 5770 X2
27.2 GPixel/s
texture rate Speed at which a graphics card can perform texture mapping
Radeon R9 280X
128 GTexel/s
Radeon HD 5770 X2
68 GTexel/s
floating point performance How fast the gpu can crunch numbers
Radeon R9 280X
4,096 GFLOPS
Radeon HD 5770 X2
2,720 GFLOPS
shading units Subcomponents of the gpu, these run in parallel to enable fast pixel shading
Radeon R9 280X
2,048
Radeon HD 5770 X2
1,600
texture mapping units Built into each gpu, these resize and rotate bitmaps for texturing scenes
Radeon R9 280X
128
Specifications Full list of technical specs
gpu | Radeon R9 280X | vs | HD 5770 X2 |
---|---|---|---|
GPU brand | AMD | ATI | |
GPU name | Tahiti | Juniper | |
Market | Desktop | Desktop | |
Clock speed | 850 MHz | 850 MHz | |
Is dual GPU | No | Yes | |
Reference card | AMD Radeon R9 280X 850 MHz 3 GB | ATi Radeon HD 5770 X2 850 MHz 2 GB | |
raw performance | |||
Shading units | 2,048 | 1,600 | |
Texture mapping units | 128 | 80 | |
Render output processors | 32 | 32 | |
Compute units | 32 | 20 | |
Pixel rate | 32 GPixel/s | 27.2 GPixel/s | |
Texture rate | 128 GTexel/s | 68 GTexel/s | |
Floating-point performance | 4,096 GFLOPS | 2,720 GFLOPS |
memory | Radeon R9 280X | vs | HD 5770 X2 |
---|---|---|---|
Memory clock speed | 1,500 MHz | 1,200 MHz | |
Effective memory clock speed | 6,000 MHz | 4,800 MHz | |
Memory bus | 384 bit | 256 bit | |
Memory | 3,072 MB | 2,048 MB | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 | |
Memory bandwidth | 288 GB/s | 153.6 GB/s |