GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of R9 280X vs 6970 among Desktop GPUs

Gaming

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more

Graphics

T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more

Computing

Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more

Performance per Watt

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Value

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Noise and Power

TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more

6.9

Overall Score

Winner
Radeon R9 280X 

GPUBoss recommends the Radeon R9 280X  based on its compute performance.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Radeon R9 280X

Reasons to consider the
Generic Radeon R9 280X

Report a correction
Better PassMark score 5,809 vs 3,493 More than 65% better PassMark score
Much higher memory bandwidth 288 GB/s vs 176 GB/s Around 65% higher memory bandwidth
Better 3DMark06 score 28,452 vs 24,035 Around 20% better 3DMark06 score
Better floating-point performance 4,096 GFLOPS vs 2,703 GFLOPS More than 50% better floating-point performance
More memory 3,072 MB vs 2,048 MB 50% more memory
Higher texture rate 128 GTexel/s vs 84.48 GTexel/s More than 50% higher texture rate
Significantly better sky diver factor score 380.99 vs 255.16 Around 50% better sky diver factor score
Higher effective memory clock speed 6,000 MHz vs 5,500 MHz Around 10% higher effective memory clock speed
Better bitcoin mining score 468.39 mHash/s vs 274.06 mHash/s More than 70% better bitcoin mining score
Significantly better PassMark direct compute score 3,677 vs 1,399 Around 2.8x better PassMark direct compute score
More shading units 2,048 vs 1,536 512 more shading units
More texture mapping units 128 vs 96 32 more texture mapping units
Wider memory bus 384 bit vs 256 bit 50% wider memory bus
More compute units 32 vs 24 8 more compute units
Higher memory clock speed 1,500 MHz vs 1,375 MHz Around 10% higher memory clock speed
Front view of Radeon HD 6970

Reasons to consider the
AMD Radeon HD 6970

Report a correction
Much better 3DMark 11 graphics score 24,035 vs 10,792 Around 2.2x better 3DMark 11 graphics score
Significantly better 3DMark vantage graphics score 22,250 vs 11,255 Around 2x better 3DMark vantage graphics score
Significantly higher battlefield 4 framerate 90 vs 39.9 More than 2.2x higher battlefield 4 framerate

Benchmarks Real world tests of Radeon R9 280X vs HD 6970

Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon R9 280X
468.39 mHash/s
Radeon HD 6970
274.06 mHash/s

Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon R9 280X
95.62 mPixels/s
Radeon HD 6970
18.68 mPixels/s

Ocean surface simulation Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon R9 280X
1,924.31 frames/s
Radeon HD 6970
920.29 frames/s

T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon R9 280X
3,356.04
Radeon HD 6970
3,351.26

Manhattan (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon R9 280X
3,709.16
Radeon HD 6970
3,706.33

Fire Strike Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Sky Diver Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Battlefield 4

Reviews Word on the street

Comments

Showing 1 comment.
www.bilgisayarservisitamiri.com this is compare
comments powered by Disqus