GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of R9 285 vs 770 among Desktop GPUs

Gaming

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more

Graphics

T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more

Computing

Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more

Performance per Watt

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Value

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Noise and Power

TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more

7

Overall Score

Winner
Nvidia GeForce GTX 770 

GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce GTX 770  based on its benchmarks and compute performance.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Radeon R9 285

Reasons to consider the
XFX Radeon R9 285

Report a correction
More shading units 1,792 vs 1,536 256 more shading units
Lower TDP 190W vs 230W More than 15% lower TDP
Front view of GeForce GTX 770

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX 770

Report a correction
Significantly higher effective memory clock speed 7,012 MHz vs 5,500 MHz More than 25% higher effective memory clock speed
Higher memory bandwidth 224 GB/s vs 176 GB/s More than 25% higher memory bandwidth
Higher clock speed 1,046 MHz vs 918 MHz Around 15% higher clock speed
Slightly better PassMark score 6,099 vs 5,549 Around 10% better PassMark score
Higher texture rate 134 GTexel/s vs 102.8 GTexel/s More than 30% higher texture rate
Significantly higher memory clock speed 1,753 MHz vs 1,375 MHz More than 25% higher memory clock speed
Better sky diver factor score 381.9 vs 344.37 More than 10% better sky diver factor score
More texture mapping units 128 vs 112 16 more texture mapping units
Higher turbo clock speed 1,085 MHz vs 1,000 MHz Around 10% higher turbo clock speed
Better ocean surface simulation score 1,631.29 frames/s vs 1,474.63 frames/s More than 10% better ocean surface simulation score
Better PassMark direct compute score 3,083 vs 2,442 More than 25% better PassMark direct compute score

Benchmarks Real world tests of Radeon R9 285 vs GeForce GTX 770

Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon R9 285
391.4 mHash/s
GeForce GTX 770
112.94 mHash/s

Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon R9 285
72.8 mPixels/s
GeForce GTX 770
50.95 mPixels/s

Ocean surface simulation Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon R9 285
1,474.63 frames/s
GeForce GTX 770
1,631.29 frames/s

T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon R9 285
3,355.84
GeForce GTX 770
3,357.38

Manhattan (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon R9 285
3,715.04
GeForce GTX 770
3,714.32

Fire Strike Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Sky Diver Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Cloud Gate Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Reviews Word on the street

Comments

comments powered by Disqus