Winner
Nvidia GeForce GTX 780 Ti
GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce GTX 780 Ti based on its .
See full details| | Radeon R9 290X vs GeForce GTX 780 Ti |
by techPowerUp!Maximum overclock using the "Quiet" BIOS is 1145 MHz GPU clock (15% overclocking) and 1295 MHz memory (4% overclock).
by techPowerUp!The EVGA ACX cooler does look nice, but I still don't think it can compete with the NVIDIA reference design cooler and its large shiny metal surfaces.
Gaming | |
Real world tests using the latest 3D games | |
| Radeon R9 290X N/A | |
| crysis: warhead (2013), Crysis: Warhead (2012), Batman: Arkham City and 6 more | |
Benchmarks | |
Synthetic tests to measure overall performance | |
| Radeon R9 290X 8.6 | |
| Passmark, 3DMark 11 Graphics, 3DMark Vantage Graphics and 3DMark06 | |
Compute Performance | |
General computing tests executed on the GPU | |
| Radeon R9 290X 8.5 | |
| Civilization 5 Texture Decomposition (2013) and Passmark Direct Compute | |
Noise and Power | |
How loud and hot does the card run idle and under load | |
| Radeon R9 290X 5.3 | |
| TDP | |
GPUBoss Score | |
Gaming, Benchmarks, Compute Performance and Noise and Power | |
| Radeon R9 290X 8.3 | |
Winner |
| | | Nvidia GeForce GTX 780 TiGPUBoss Winner |
| |||||||
| Significantly better 3DMark 11 graphics score | 25,101.5 | vs | 15,630 | More than 60% better 3DMark 11 graphics score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Higher clock speed | 1,000 MHz | vs | 875 MHz | Around 15% higher clock speed | |||
| More memory | 4,096 MB | vs | 3,072 MB | Around 35% more memory | |||
| Higher pixel rate | 64 GPixel/s | vs | 52.5 GPixel/s | More than 20% higher pixel rate | |||
| Better floating-point performance | 5,632 GFLOPS | vs | 5,040 GFLOPS | More than 10% better floating-point performance | |||
| More render output processors | 64 | vs | 48 | 16 more render output processors | |||
| Wider memory bus | 512 bit | vs | 384 bit | Around 35% wider memory bus | |||
| |||||||
| Better passmark score | 9,014 | vs | 6,826 | More than 30% better passmark score | |||
| Significantly higher effective memory clock speed | 7,000 MHz | vs | 5,000 MHz | 40% higher effective memory clock speed | |||
| Better 3DMark vantage graphics score | 46,186 | vs | 38,367 | More than 20% better 3DMark vantage graphics score | |||
| Higher texture rate | 210 GTexel/s | vs | 176 GTexel/s | Around 20% higher texture rate | |||
| Significantly higher memory clock speed | 1,752 MHz | vs | 1,250 MHz | More than 40% higher memory clock speed | |||
| More texture mapping units | 240 | vs | 176 | 64 more texture mapping units | |||
| Better passmark direct compute score | 4,653 | vs | 3,121 | Around 50% better passmark direct compute score | |||
| Higher BioShock infinite framerate | 116.4 fps | vs | 94.9 fps | Around 25% higher BioShock infinite framerate | |||
| Better civilization 5 texture decomposition (2013) score | 396 | vs | 373.9 | More than 5% better civilization 5 texture decomposition (2013) score | |||
| Lower TDP | 250W | vs | 300W | More than 15% lower TDP | |||
| Radeon R9 290X | vs | GeForce GTX 780 Ti | ||
| 9.2 | 9.4 | GeForce GTX 780 Ti | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| VS | |
| 780 Ti vs 980 | ||
| VS | |
| 780 Ti vs 970 | ||
| VS | |
| 780 Ti vs 780 | ||
| VS | |
| R9 290X vs 970 | ||
| VS | |
| R9 290X vs 980 | ||
| VS | |
| R9 290X vs 780 | ||
| VS | |
| R9 290X vs R9 290 | ||
| VS | |
| 780 vs 970 | ||
| VS | |
| 780 Ti vs 980 | ||
| VS | |
| 770 vs 970 | ||
| VS | |
| 780 Ti vs 970 | ||
| VS | |
| R9 M295X vs 980M | ||
| VS | |
| 760 vs R9 270X | ||
| VS | |
| R9 290X vs 970 | ||