Winner
Nvidia GeForce GTX 780 Ti
GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce GTX 780 Ti based on its compute performance and noise and power.
See full details | Radeon R9 290X vs GeForce GTX 780 Ti |
Gaming | |
| |
Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more |
Graphics | |
| |
T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more |
Computing | |
| |
Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more |
Performance per Watt | |
| |
Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more |
Value | |
| |
Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more |
Noise and Power | |
| |
TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more |
8.2 | Overall Score |
| |
Winner |
| ![]() | Nvidia GeForce GTX 780 TiGPUBoss Winner |
| |||||||
Much better 3DMark 11 graphics score | 32,271 | vs | 15,630 | More than 2x better 3DMark 11 graphics score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Higher clock speed | 1,000 MHz | vs | 875 MHz | Around 15% higher clock speed | |||
Much better bitcoin mining score | 625.33 mHash/s | vs | 182.11 mHash/s | Around 3.5x better bitcoin mining score | |||
More memory | 4,096 MB | vs | 3,072 MB | Around 35% more memory | |||
Better floating-point performance | 5,632 GFLOPS | vs | 5,040 GFLOPS | More than 10% better floating-point performance | |||
More render output processors | 64 | vs | 48 | 16 more render output processors | |||
Higher pixel rate | 64 GPixel/s | vs | 52.5 GPixel/s | More than 20% higher pixel rate | |||
Wider memory bus | 512 bit | vs | 384 bit | Around 35% wider memory bus | |||
| |||||||
Significantly higher effective memory clock speed | 7,000 MHz | vs | 5,000 MHz | 40% higher effective memory clock speed | |||
Better PassMark score | 8,890 | vs | 7,331 | More than 20% better PassMark score | |||
Better 3DMark vantage graphics score | 46,186 | vs | 42,403.5 | Around 10% better 3DMark vantage graphics score | |||
Significantly more texture mapping units | 240 | vs | 176 | 64 more texture mapping units | |||
Higher texture rate | 210 GTexel/s | vs | 176 GTexel/s | Around 20% higher texture rate | |||
Significantly higher memory clock speed | 1,752 MHz | vs | 1,250 MHz | More than 40% higher memory clock speed | |||
Slightly higher memory bandwidth | 336 GB/s | vs | 320 GB/s | 5% higher memory bandwidth | |||
Higher BioShock infinite framerate | 116.4 fps | vs | 94.9 fps | Around 25% higher BioShock infinite framerate | |||
Better PassMark direct compute score | 4,688 | vs | 3,510 | Around 35% better PassMark direct compute score | |||
Higher battlefield 4 framerate | 85.4 | vs | 68.75 | Around 25% higher battlefield 4 framerate | |||
Lower TDP | 250W | vs | 300W | More than 15% lower TDP |
Radeon R9 290X | vs | GeForce GTX 780 Ti | ||
![]() | 9.2 | 9.4 |
---|
![]() | VS | ![]() |
R9 290X vs 970 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
R9 290X vs 780 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
R9 290X vs 980 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
R9 290X vs R9 290 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
780 Ti vs 970 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
780 Ti vs 980 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
780 Ti vs 780 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$280 | ||
1060 vs RX 580 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$280 | ||
1060 vs 1050 Ti | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$280 | ||
970 vs 1060 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
970 vs 1050 Ti | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
960 vs 1050 Ti | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
970 vs 960 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
1070 vs RX 580 | ||