Winner
AMD Radeon R9 290X
GPUBoss recommends the AMD Radeon R9 290X based on its benchmarks.
See full details | Radeon R9 290X vs GeForce GTX TITAN |
Gaming | |
| |
Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more |
Graphics | |
| |
T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more |
Computing | |
| |
Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more |
Performance per Watt | |
| |
Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more |
Value | |
| |
Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more |
Noise and Power | |
| |
TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more |
8.2 | Overall Score |
| |
Winner |
AMD Radeon R9 290XGPUBoss Winner | ![]() | |
| |||||||
Much better 3DMark 11 graphics score | 32,271 | vs | 14,090 | More than 2.2x better 3DMark 11 graphics score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Higher clock speed | 1,000 MHz | vs | 836 MHz | Around 20% higher clock speed | |||
Better floating-point performance | 5,632 GFLOPS | vs | 4,494 GFLOPS | More than 25% better floating-point performance | |||
Higher memory bandwidth | 320 GB/s | vs | 288.4 GB/s | More than 10% higher memory bandwidth | |||
Higher pixel rate | 64 GPixel/s | vs | 46.8 GPixel/s | More than 35% higher pixel rate | |||
More render output processors | 64 | vs | 48 | 16 more render output processors | |||
Significantly higher metro: last light framerate | 77.5 | vs | 42 | Around 85% higher metro: last light framerate | |||
Wider memory bus | 512 bit | vs | 384 bit | Around 35% wider memory bus | |||
Higher turbo clock speed | 1,000 MHz | vs | 876 MHz | Around 15% higher turbo clock speed | |||
| |||||||
Much better 3DMark06 score | 38,420 | vs | 16,167.5 | Around 2.5x better 3DMark06 score | |||
More memory | 6,144 MB | vs | 4,096 MB | 50% more memory | |||
Higher effective memory clock speed | 6,008 MHz | vs | 5,000 MHz | More than 20% higher effective memory clock speed | |||
Better 3DMark vantage graphics score | 46,180 | vs | 42,403.5 | Around 10% better 3DMark vantage graphics score | |||
Slightly better PassMark score | 7,881 | vs | 7,331 | Around 10% better PassMark score | |||
More texture mapping units | 224 | vs | 176 | 48 more texture mapping units | |||
Higher memory clock speed | 1,502 MHz | vs | 1,250 MHz | More than 20% higher memory clock speed | |||
Better particle simulation score | 939.65 mInteraction/s | vs | 821.28 mInteraction/s | Around 15% better particle simulation score | |||
Better PassMark direct compute score | 4,122 | vs | 3,510 | More than 15% better PassMark direct compute score | |||
Higher BioShock infinite framerate | 103.7 fps | vs | 94.9 fps | Around 10% higher BioShock infinite framerate | |||
Lower TDP | 250W | vs | 300W | More than 15% lower TDP |
Radeon R9 290X | vs | GeForce GTX TITAN | ||
![]() | 9.2 | 8.9 |
---|
![]() | VS | ![]() |
970 vs R9 290X | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
780 vs R9 290X | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
980 vs R9 290X | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
780 Ti vs R9 290X | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
R9 290 vs R9 290X | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
980 vs TITAN | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
780 vs TITAN | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$280 | ||
1050 Ti vs 1060 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$280 | ||
1060 vs 970 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
1050 Ti vs 970 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
960 vs 970 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$280 | ||
RX 580 vs 1060 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
1050 Ti vs 960 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$274 | ||
960 vs 750 Ti | ||