GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of R9 290X vs 7650M Rebrand among all GPUs

Gaming

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more

Graphics

T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more

Computing

Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more

Performance per Watt

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Noise and Power

TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more

Winner
AMD Radeon R9 290X 

GPUBoss recommends the AMD Radeon R9 290X  based on its benchmarks and compute performance.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

AMD Radeon R9 290X

GPUBoss Winner
Front view of Radeon R9 290X

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Radeon R9 290X

Reasons to consider the
AMD Radeon R9 290X

Report a correction
Much better 3DMark 11 graphics score 32,271 vs 7,333 Around 4.5x better 3DMark 11 graphics score
Much better 3DMark vantage graphics score 42,403.5 vs 3,886 Around 11x better 3DMark vantage graphics score
Much better PassMark score 7,331 vs 725 More than 10x better PassMark score
Much better 3DMark06 score 16,167.5 vs 945.5 More than 17x better 3DMark06 score
Much higher clock speed 1,000 MHz vs 485 MHz More than 2x higher clock speed
Much higher memory bandwidth 320 GB/s vs 25.6 GB/s Around 12.5x higher memory bandwidth
Significantly better floating-point performance 5,632 GFLOPS vs 465.6 GFLOPS More than 12x better floating-point performance
Significantly higher effective memory clock speed 5,000 MHz vs 1,600 MHz Around 3.2x higher effective memory clock speed
Significantly higher pixel rate 64 GPixel/s vs 3.88 GPixel/s Around 16.5x higher pixel rate
Significantly higher texture rate 176 GTexel/s vs 11.64 GTexel/s More than 15x higher texture rate
More memory 4,096 MB vs 1,024 MB 4x more memory
Much better fire strike factor score 73.87 vs 7.3 More than 10x better fire strike factor score
Many more render output processors 64 vs 8 56 more render output processors
Many more texture mapping units 176 vs 24 152 more texture mapping units
Many more shading units 2,816 vs 480 2336 more shading units
Many more compute units 44 vs 6 38 more compute units
Much better PassMark direct compute score 3,510 vs 302 More than 11.5x better PassMark direct compute score
Higher memory clock speed 1,250 MHz vs 800 MHz More than 55% higher memory clock speed
Wider memory bus 512 bit vs 128 bit 4x wider memory bus
Front view of Radeon HD 7650M Rebrand

Reasons to consider the
AMD Radeon HD 7650M Rebrand

Report a correction
Much lower TDP 20W vs 300W 15x lower TDP

Benchmarks Real world tests of Radeon R9 290X vs HD 7650M Rebrand

PassMark Industry standard benchmark for overall graphics card performanceData courtesy Passmark

3DMark 11 Graphics Industry standard benchmark that tests DirectX 11 GPU performance

3DMark Vantage Graphics Industry standard benchmark that tests DirectX 10 GPU performance

3DMark06 Industry standard benchmark that tests DirectX 9 GPU performance

Fire Strike Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Sky Diver Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Cloud Gate Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

PassMark Direct Compute Measures performance of general-purpose computing using Microsoft DirectCompute

Comments

comments powered by Disqus