GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of R9 295X2 vs 1080 Ti among all GPUs

Gaming

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more

Graphics

T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more

Computing

Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more

Performance per Watt

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Noise and Power

TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more

8.8

Overall Score

Winner
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti 

GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti  based on its benchmarks and compute performance.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Radeon R9 295X2

Reasons to consider the
XFX Radeon R9 295X2

Report a correction
Is dual GPU Yes vs No About half of graphics cards are dual GPU
Many more shading units 5,632 vs 3,584 2048 more shading units
Significantly more texture mapping units 352 vs 224 128 more texture mapping units
Significantly more render output processors 128 vs 88 40 more render output processors
Higher texture rate 358.4 GTexel/s vs 312.6 GTexel/s Around 15% higher texture rate
Better floating-point performance 11,466 GFLOPS vs 10,609 GFLOPS Around 10% better floating-point performance
Better video composition score 79.34 frames/s vs 25.89 frames/s More than 3x better video composition score
Wider memory bus 1,024 bit vs 352 bit Around 3x wider memory bus
Front view of GeForce GTX 1080 Ti

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti

Report a correction
Significantly better PassMark score 13,216 vs 7,435 Around 80% better PassMark score
Significantly higher clock speed 1,480 MHz vs 1,018 MHz More than 45% higher clock speed
Much higher effective memory clock speed 11,008 MHz vs 5,000 MHz Around 2.2x higher effective memory clock speed
More memory 11,264 MB vs 8,192 MB Around 40% more memory
Much better PassMark direct compute score 9,434 vs 3,441 Around 2.8x better PassMark direct compute score
Better cloud gate factor score 27.05 vs 24.12 More than 10% better cloud gate factor score
Much lower TDP 220W vs 500W 2.3x lower TDP
Higher memory clock speed 1,376 MHz vs 1,250 MHz More than 10% higher memory clock speed

Benchmarks Real world tests of Radeon R9 295X2 vs GeForce GTX 1080 Ti

Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon R9 295X2
614.07 mHash/s
GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
968.67 mHash/s

Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon R9 295X2
116.41 mPixels/s
GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
169.13 mPixels/s

Ocean surface simulation Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon R9 295X2
1,997.66 frames/s
GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
3,935.36 frames/s

Particle simulation Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon R9 295X2
651.4 mInteraction/s
GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
1,874.43 mInteraction/s

T-Rex (Compubench 1.5) Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon R9 295X2
10.68 frames/s
GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
18.58 frames/s

Fire Strike Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Sky Diver Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Cloud Gate Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Comments

comments powered by Disqus