Winner
Nvidia GeForce GTX 780 Ti
GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce GTX 780 Ti based on its .
See full details| | Radeon R9 295X2 vs GeForce GTX 780 Ti |
by techPowerUp!Each of the two 6.2 billion-transistor GPUs has all its 2,816 GCN2 stream processors enabled, along with 176 texture memory units, 64 ROPs, and 512-bit wide GDDR5 memory interfaces that each hold 4 GB of memory for a total of 8 GB on the card, which should be more than enough memory for any display configuration you can try out with this card.
by techPowerUp!The EVGA ACX cooler does look nice, but I still don't think it can compete with the NVIDIA reference design cooler and its large shiny metal surfaces.
Gaming | |
Real world tests using the latest 3D games | |
| Radeon R9 295X2 N/A | |
| crysis: warhead (2013), Crysis: Warhead (2012), Batman: Arkham City and 6 more | |
Benchmarks | |
Synthetic tests to measure overall performance | |
| Radeon R9 295X2 8.7 | |
| Passmark | |
Compute Performance | |
General computing tests executed on the GPU | |
| Radeon R9 295X2 7.3 | |
| Passmark Direct Compute | |
Noise and Power | |
How loud and hot does the card run idle and under load | |
| Radeon R9 295X2 5.2 | |
| TDP | |
GPUBoss Score | |
Gaming, Benchmarks, Compute Performance and Noise and Power | |
| Radeon R9 295X2 7.8 | |
Winner |
| | | Nvidia GeForce GTX 780 TiGPUBoss Winner |
| |||||||
| Is dual GPU | Yes | vs | No | About half of graphics cards are dual GPU | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Much more memory | 8,192 MB | vs | 3,072 MB | Around 2.8x more memory | |||
| Much better floating-point performance | 11,466 GFLOPS | vs | 5,040 GFLOPS | More than 2.2x better floating-point performance | |||
| Much higher pixel rate | 130.4 GPixel/s | vs | 52.5 GPixel/s | Around 2.5x higher pixel rate | |||
| Higher clock speed | 1,018 MHz | vs | 875 MHz | More than 15% higher clock speed | |||
| Many more render output processors | 128 | vs | 48 | 80 more render output processors | |||
| Many more shading units | 5,632 | vs | 2,880 | 2752 more shading units | |||
| Much wider memory bus | 1,024 bit | vs | 384 bit | Around 2.8x wider memory bus | |||
| Significantly more texture mapping units | 352 | vs | 240 | 112 more texture mapping units | |||
| |||||||
| Better passmark score | 9,014 | vs | 7,020 | Around 30% better passmark score | |||
| Significantly higher effective memory clock speed | 7,000 MHz | vs | 5,000 MHz | 40% higher effective memory clock speed | |||
| Significantly higher memory clock speed | 1,752 MHz | vs | 1,250 MHz | More than 40% higher memory clock speed | |||
| Significantly better passmark direct compute score | 4,653 | vs | 3,023 | Around 55% better passmark direct compute score | |||
| Much lower TDP | 250W | vs | 500W | 2x lower TDP | |||
| Radeon R9 295X2 | vs | GeForce GTX 780 Ti | ||
| 8.6 | 9.4 | GeForce GTX 780 Ti | |
|---|---|---|---|---|