Winner
Nvidia GeForce GTX 780 Ti
GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce GTX 780 Ti based on its benchmarks, compute performance and noise and power.
See full details | Radeon R9 295X2 vs GeForce GTX 780 Ti |
Gaming | |
| |
Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more |
Graphics | |
| |
T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more |
Computing | |
| |
Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more |
Performance per Watt | |
| |
Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more |
Value | |
| |
Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more |
Noise and Power | |
| |
TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more |
8 | Overall Score |
| |
Winner |
| ![]() | Nvidia GeForce GTX 780 TiGPUBoss Winner |
| |||||||
Is dual GPU | Yes | vs | No | About half of graphics cards are dual GPU | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Much better floating-point performance | 11,466 GFLOPS | vs | 5,040 GFLOPS | More than 2.2x better floating-point performance | |||
Significantly more memory | 8,192 MB | vs | 3,072 MB | Around 2.8x more memory | |||
Much higher pixel rate | 130.4 GPixel/s | vs | 52.5 GPixel/s | Around 2.5x higher pixel rate | |||
Much higher texture rate | 358.4 GTexel/s | vs | 210 GTexel/s | More than 70% higher texture rate | |||
Many more render output processors | 128 | vs | 48 | 80 more render output processors | |||
Many more shading units | 5,632 | vs | 2,880 | 2752 more shading units | |||
Higher clock speed | 1,018 MHz | vs | 875 MHz | More than 15% higher clock speed | |||
Much wider memory bus | 1,024 bit | vs | 384 bit | Around 2.8x wider memory bus | |||
Many more texture mapping units | 352 | vs | 240 | 112 more texture mapping units | |||
Better face detection score | 116.41 mPixels/s | vs | 75.43 mPixels/s | Around 55% better face detection score | |||
Better cloud gate factor score | 24.18 | vs | 22.28 | Around 10% better cloud gate factor score | |||
| |||||||
Significantly higher effective memory clock speed | 7,000 MHz | vs | 5,000 MHz | 40% higher effective memory clock speed | |||
Better PassMark score | 8,890 | vs | 7,462 | Around 20% better PassMark score | |||
Significantly higher memory clock speed | 1,752 MHz | vs | 1,250 MHz | More than 40% higher memory clock speed | |||
Better PassMark direct compute score | 4,688 | vs | 3,456 | More than 35% better PassMark direct compute score | |||
Much lower TDP | 250W | vs | 500W | 2x lower TDP |
Radeon R9 295X2 | vs | GeForce GTX 780 Ti | ||
![]() | 8.6 | 9.4 |
---|