0 Comments
| Radeon R9 295X2 vs GeForce GTX TITAN X |
VS
GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of R9 295X2 vs TITAN X among Desktop GPUs
Gaming | |
| |
Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more |
Graphics | |
| |
T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more |
Computing | |
| |
Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more |
Performance per Watt | |
| |
Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more |
Value | |
| |
Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more |
Noise and Power | |
| |
TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more |
No winner declared
Too close to call
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Is dual GPU | Yes | vs | No | About half of graphics cards are dual GPU | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Much better floating-point performance | 11,466 GFLOPS | vs | 6,144 GFLOPS | More than 85% better floating-point performance | |||
Much higher texture rate | 358.4 GTexel/s | vs | 192 GTexel/s | More than 85% higher texture rate | |||
Many more shading units | 5,632 | vs | 3,072 | 2560 more shading units | |||
Many more texture mapping units | 352 | vs | 192 | 160 more texture mapping units | |||
Much wider memory bus | 1,024 bit | vs | 384 bit | Around 2.8x wider memory bus | |||
Significantly higher pixel rate | 130.4 GPixel/s | vs | 96 GPixel/s | More than 35% higher pixel rate | |||
Significantly more render output processors | 128 | vs | 96 | 32 more render output processors | |||
| |||||||
Significantly better PassMark score | 10,669 | vs | 7,462 | Around 45% better PassMark score | |||
Significantly more memory | 12,288 MB | vs | 8,192 MB | 50% more memory | |||
Significantly higher effective memory clock speed | 7,012 MHz | vs | 5,000 MHz | More than 40% higher effective memory clock speed | |||
Much better PassMark direct compute score | 6,279 | vs | 3,456 | More than 80% better PassMark direct compute score | |||
Significantly higher memory clock speed | 1,753 MHz | vs | 1,250 MHz | More than 40% higher memory clock speed | |||
Much lower TDP | 250W | vs | 500W | 2x lower TDP | |||
Slightly better T-Rex score | 11.39 frames/s | vs | 10.68 frames/s | More than 5% better T-Rex score |
Benchmarks Real world tests of Radeon R9 295X2 vs GeForce GTX TITAN X
PassMark Industry standard benchmark for overall graphics card performanceData courtesy Passmark
Radeon R9 295X2
7,462
GeForce GTX TITAN X
10,669
Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench
Radeon R9 295X2
614.07 mHash/s
GeForce GTX TITAN X
775.76 mHash/s
Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench
Radeon R9 295X2
116.41 mPixels/s
GeForce GTX TITAN X
224 mPixels/s
Ocean surface simulation Data courtesy CompuBench
Radeon R9 295X2
1,997.66 frames/s
GeForce GTX TITAN X
2,566.17 frames/s
Particle simulation Data courtesy CompuBench
Radeon R9 295X2
651.4 mInteraction/s
GeForce GTX TITAN X
1,371.74 mInteraction/s
T-Rex (Compubench 1.5) Data courtesy CompuBench
Radeon R9 295X2
10.68 frames/s
GeForce GTX TITAN X
11.39 frames/s
Video composition Data courtesy CompuBench
Radeon R9 295X2
79.34 frames/s
GeForce GTX TITAN X
134.13 frames/s
PassMark Direct Compute Measures performance of general-purpose computing using Microsoft DirectCompute
Radeon R9 295X2
3,456
GeForce GTX TITAN X
6,279
Reviews Word on the street
Radeon R9 295X2 | vs | GeForce GTX TITAN X | ||
![]() | 8.6 | 8.8 |
---|
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
980 Ti vs TITAN X | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
TITAN Z vs TITAN X | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
1080 Ti vs TITAN X | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
1080 vs TITAN X | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
980 vs TITAN X | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$1,000 | ||
TITAN Z vs R9 295X2 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$1,000 | ||
980 vs R9 295X2 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$304 | ||
1050 Ti vs 1060 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
1050 Ti vs 970 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$304 | ||
1060 vs 970 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
960 vs 970 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
1050 Ti vs 960 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$274 | ||
960 vs 750 Ti | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$304 | ||
RX 580 vs 1060 | ||
Read more
Comments
Showing 25 comments.
Ding diubciheb (04:55 AM, June 28, 2016)
Stephanie Lauterbach (08:50 AM, April 12, 2016)
AMDOUCHES vs NVIIOTS . . . lol (04:04 AM, March 3, 2016)
Bill hater (05:08 PM, February 1, 2016)
Guest (08:33 PM, January 25, 2016)
FireItUp (10:18 PM, December 17, 2015)
Jeroen van Son (07:12 PM, November 5, 2015)
Jeroen van Son (07:10 PM, November 5, 2015)
Shao Zapomni (10:33 PM, October 21, 2015)
MDevellis (01:14 AM, August 31, 2015)
Steve Bike (03:52 AM, August 30, 2015)
José Bauer Rodrigues Jr. (02:20 AM, July 31, 2015)
José Bauer Rodrigues Jr. (02:18 AM, July 31, 2015)
Augusto Terceiro Fernandes de (09:52 PM, July 3, 2015)
Mr. Keyes (03:42 PM, June 26, 2015)
The Spooky Ghost (02:52 AM, June 23, 2015)
José Bauer Rodrigues Jr. (10:33 PM, June 18, 2015)
MrGerdbrecht (05:38 AM, June 14, 2015)
gabriel (12:28 PM, June 12, 2015)
Alex Riddle (05:02 PM, June 7, 2015)
Michael Norris (03:22 AM, June 3, 2015)
Andrew Osei (07:16 AM, June 1, 2015)
Andrew Osei (07:09 AM, June 1, 2015)
Crevarius (12:35 AM, June 1, 2015)
Crevarius (12:34 AM, June 1, 2015)