GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of R9 360 vs 1060 among Desktop GPUs

Gaming

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more

Graphics

T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more

Computing

Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more

Performance per Watt

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Value

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Noise and Power

TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more

7.1

Overall Score

Winner
MSI GeForce GTX 1060 

GPUBoss recommends the MSI GeForce GTX 1060  based on its benchmarks and compute performance.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS
Front view of GeForce GTX 1060

MSI GeForce GTX 1060

GPUBoss Winner

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Radeon R9 360

Reasons to consider the
AMD Radeon R9 360

Report a correction
Lower TDP 85W vs 120W Around 30% lower TDP
Front view of GeForce GTX 1060

Reasons to consider the
MSI GeForce GTX 1060

Report a correction
Much better PassMark score 8,686 vs 3,046 More than 2.8x better PassMark score
Much higher clock speed 1,544 MHz vs 1,000 MHz Around 55% higher clock speed
Significantly more memory 6,144 MB vs 2,048 MB 3x more memory
Significantly higher memory bandwidth 192.2 GB/s vs 104 GB/s Around 85% higher memory bandwidth
Much higher pixel rate 74.1 GPixel/s vs 16.8 GPixel/s Around 4.5x higher pixel rate
Significantly better floating-point performance 3,953 GFLOPS vs 1,612.8 GFLOPS Around 2.5x better floating-point performance
Significantly higher effective memory clock speed 8,008 MHz vs 6,500 MHz Around 25% higher effective memory clock speed
Significantly higher texture rate 123.5 GTexel/s vs 50.4 GTexel/s Around 2.5x higher texture rate
Much higher turbo clock speed 1,759 MHz vs 1,050 MHz Around 70% higher turbo clock speed
Significantly more render output processors 48 vs 16 Three times as many render output processors
Much better T-Rex score 8.68 frames/s vs 3.44 frames/s More than 2.5x better T-Rex score
Much better PassMark direct compute score 5,049 vs 1,329 More than 3.8x better PassMark direct compute score
More shading units 1,280 vs 768 512 more shading units
More texture mapping units 80 vs 48 32 more texture mapping units
Significantly higher memory clock speed 2,002 MHz vs 1,625 MHz Around 25% higher memory clock speed
Wider memory bus 192 bit vs 128 bit 50% wider memory bus

Benchmarks Real world tests of Radeon R9 360 vs GeForce GTX 1060

Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon R9 360
171.26 mHash/s
GeForce GTX 1060
576.4 mHash/s

Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon R9 360
39.28 mPixels/s
GeForce GTX 1060
119.24 mPixels/s

Ocean surface simulation Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon R9 360
815.35 frames/s
GeForce GTX 1060
1,766.73 frames/s

Particle simulation Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon R9 360
328.35 mInteraction/s
GeForce GTX 1060
1,196.96 mInteraction/s

T-Rex (Compubench 1.5) Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon R9 360
3.44 frames/s
GeForce GTX 1060
8.68 frames/s

Video composition Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon R9 360
63.72 frames/s
GeForce GTX 1060
21.91 frames/s

T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

Manhattan (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon R9 360
3,693.05
GeForce GTX 1060
3,717.62

Comments

comments powered by Disqus