GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of R9 380 vs 1060 among Desktop GPUs

Gaming

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more

Graphics

T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more

Computing

Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more

Performance per Watt

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Value

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Noise and Power

TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more

7.3

Overall Score

Winner
MSI GeForce GTX 1060 

GPUBoss recommends the MSI GeForce GTX 1060  based on its benchmarks, compute performance and noise and power.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS
Front view of GeForce GTX 1060

MSI GeForce GTX 1060

GPUBoss Winner

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Radeon R9 380

Reasons to consider the
AMD Radeon R9 380

Report a correction
More shading units 1,792 vs 1,280 512 more shading units
More texture mapping units 112 vs 80 32 more texture mapping units
Wider memory bus 256 bit vs 192 bit Around 35% wider memory bus
Front view of GeForce GTX 1060

Reasons to consider the
MSI GeForce GTX 1060

Report a correction
Much higher clock speed 1,544 MHz vs 970 MHz Around 60% higher clock speed
Significantly better PassMark score 8,686 vs 6,049 Around 45% better PassMark score
Significantly more memory 6,144 MB vs 2,048 MB 3x more memory
Much higher effective memory clock speed 8,008 MHz vs 5,500 MHz More than 45% higher effective memory clock speed
Significantly higher pixel rate 74.1 GPixel/s vs 31.04 GPixel/s Around 2.5x higher pixel rate
Much higher memory clock speed 2,002 MHz vs 1,375 MHz More than 45% higher memory clock speed
More render output processors 48 vs 32 16 more render output processors
Slightly higher memory bandwidth 192.2 GB/s vs 176 GB/s Around 10% higher memory bandwidth
Slightly better floating-point performance 3,953 GFLOPS vs 3,476 GFLOPS Around 15% better floating-point performance
Significantly better PassMark direct compute score 5,049 vs 2,938 More than 70% better PassMark direct compute score
Slightly higher texture rate 123.5 GTexel/s vs 108.6 GTexel/s Around 15% higher texture rate
Better T-Rex score 8.68 frames/s vs 7.07 frames/s Around 25% better T-Rex score
Lower TDP 120W vs 190W More than 35% lower TDP

Benchmarks Real world tests of Radeon R9 380 vs GeForce GTX 1060

Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon R9 380
410.27 mHash/s
GeForce GTX 1060
463.7 mHash/s

Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon R9 380
84.59 mPixels/s
GeForce GTX 1060
159.36 mPixels/s

Ocean surface simulation Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon R9 380
1,503.63 frames/s
GeForce GTX 1060
1,353.97 frames/s

Particle simulation Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon R9 380
561.05 mInteraction/s
GeForce GTX 1060
1,098.84 mInteraction/s

T-Rex (Compubench 1.5) Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon R9 380
7.07 frames/s
GeForce GTX 1060
8.68 frames/s

Video composition Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon R9 380
98.28 frames/s
GeForce GTX 1060
21.91 frames/s

T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon R9 380
3,356.32
GeForce GTX 1060
3,247.72

Manhattan (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon R9 380
3,715.58
GeForce GTX 1060
3,594.09

Comments

comments powered by Disqus