GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of R9 380 vs 6770M among all GPUs

Gaming

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more

Graphics

T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more

Computing

Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more

Performance per Watt

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Noise and Power

TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more

6.7

Overall Score

Winner
AMD Radeon R9 380 

GPUBoss recommends the AMD Radeon R9 380  based on its benchmarks.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Radeon R9 380

Reasons to consider the
AMD Radeon R9 380

Report a correction
Much better 3DMark 11 graphics score 31,844 vs 10,056 Around 3.2x better 3DMark 11 graphics score
Significantly better PassMark score 6,049 vs 992 More than 6x better PassMark score
Much better 3DMark vantage graphics score 31,181 vs 5,159 More than 6x better 3DMark vantage graphics score
Much better 3DMark06 score 12,191 vs 1,328 Around 9.2x better 3DMark06 score
Higher clock speed 918 MHz vs 725 MHz More than 25% higher clock speed
Higher memory bandwidth 176 GB/s vs 57.6 GB/s More than 3x higher memory bandwidth
More memory 4,096 MB vs 1,024 MB 4x more memory
Better floating-point performance 3,290 GFLOPS vs 696 GFLOPS Around 4.8x better floating-point performance
Higher effective memory clock speed 5,500 MHz vs 3,600 MHz Around 55% higher effective memory clock speed
Much better cloud gate factor score 20.15 vs 10.49 More than 90% better cloud gate factor score
Higher texture rate 102.8 GTexel/s vs 17.4 GTexel/s Around 6x higher texture rate
Higher pixel rate 29.38 GPixel/s vs 5.8 GPixel/s More than 5x higher pixel rate
Significantly better video composition score 98.28 frames/s vs 15.45 frames/s More than 6.2x better video composition score
Significantly more texture mapping units 112 vs 24 88 more texture mapping units
Significantly more shading units 1,792 vs 480 1312 more shading units
More render output processors 32 vs 8 24 more render output processors
More compute units 28 vs 6 22 more compute units
Significantly higher memory clock speed 1,375 MHz vs 900 MHz Around 55% higher memory clock speed
Front view of Radeon HD 6770M

Reasons to consider the
AMD Radeon HD 6770M

Report a correction
Significantly lower TDP 35W vs 190W 5.4x lower TDP

Benchmarks Real world tests of Radeon R9 380 vs HD 6770M

Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon R9 380
410.27 mHash/s
Radeon HD 6770M
33.39 mHash/s

Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon R9 380
84.59 mPixels/s
Radeon HD 6770M
4.82 mPixels/s

Ocean surface simulation Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon R9 380
1,503.63 frames/s
Radeon HD 6770M
234.83 frames/s

Particle simulation Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon R9 380
561.05 mInteraction/s
Radeon HD 6770M
77.14 mInteraction/s

T-Rex (Compubench 1.5) Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon R9 380
7.07 frames/s
Radeon HD 6770M
0.39 frames/s

Fire Strike Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Sky Diver Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Cloud Gate Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Comments

comments powered by Disqus