GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of R9 380X vs R7 260X among Desktop GPUs

Gaming

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more

Graphics

T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more

Computing

Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more

Performance per Watt

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Value

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Noise and Power

TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more

7.4

Overall Score

Winner
AMD Radeon R9 380X 

GPUBoss recommends the AMD Radeon R9 380X  based on its benchmarks and compute performance.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

AMD Radeon R9 380X

GPUBoss Winner
Front view of Radeon R9 380X

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Radeon R9 380X

Reasons to consider the
AMD Radeon R9 380X

Report a correction
Better PassMark score 6,048 vs 3,128 Around 95% better PassMark score
Significantly higher memory bandwidth 182.4 GB/s vs 104 GB/s More than 75% higher memory bandwidth
More memory 4,096 MB vs 2,048 MB 2x more memory
Better floating-point performance 3,973 GFLOPS vs 1,971.2 GFLOPS More than 2x better floating-point performance
Higher texture rate 124.2 GTexel/s vs 61.6 GTexel/s More than 2x higher texture rate
Significantly more shading units 2,048 vs 896 1152 more shading units
Significantly more texture mapping units 128 vs 56 72 more texture mapping units
Significantly higher metro: last light framerate 64 vs 6.9 More than 9.2x higher metro: last light framerate
Better fire strike factor score 56.18 vs 33.7 More than 65% better fire strike factor score
Higher pixel rate 31.04 GPixel/s vs 17.6 GPixel/s More than 75% higher pixel rate
More compute units 32 vs 14 18 more compute units
More render output processors 32 vs 16 Twice as many render output processors
Better particle simulation score 582.48 mInteraction/s vs 352.84 mInteraction/s More than 65% better particle simulation score
Better PassMark direct compute score 2,984 vs 1,681 Around 80% better PassMark direct compute score
Front view of Radeon R7 260X

Reasons to consider the
AMD Radeon R7 260X

Report a correction
Higher clock speed 1,100 MHz vs 970 MHz Around 15% higher clock speed
Higher effective memory clock speed 6,500 MHz vs 5,700 MHz Around 15% higher effective memory clock speed
Higher memory clock speed 1,625 MHz vs 1,425 MHz Around 15% higher memory clock speed
Significantly lower TDP 115W vs 190W Around 40% lower TDP

Benchmarks Real world tests of Radeon R9 380X vs R7 260X

Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon R9 380X
478.65 mHash/s
Radeon R7 260X
225.27 mHash/s

Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon R9 380X
81.44 mPixels/s
Radeon R7 260X
43.62 mPixels/s

Ocean surface simulation Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon R9 380X
1,498.03 frames/s
Radeon R7 260X
803.25 frames/s

Particle simulation Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon R9 380X
582.48 mInteraction/s
Radeon R7 260X
352.84 mInteraction/s

Fire Strike Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Sky Diver Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Cloud Gate Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Metro: Last Light

Reviews Word on the street

Radeon R9 380X  vs R7 260X 

9.1
7.8
Furmark maximum power reaches 225 W, which is exactly what the 2x6-pin power inputs are specified for, so ASUS adjusted the power limit to a good value.
Radeon R9 380X

Comments

comments powered by Disqus