0 Comments
| Radeon R9 A375 vs GeForce GTX 960 |
VS
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
GPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the AMD Radeon R9 A375 vs the Nvidia GeForce GTX 960. | |||||||
| |||||||
Higher clock speed | 1,127 MHz | vs | 900 MHz | More than 25% higher clock speed | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Higher effective memory clock speed | 7,012 MHz | vs | 4,500 MHz | More than 55% higher effective memory clock speed | |||
Higher pixel rate | 36.1 GPixel/s | vs | 14.4 GPixel/s | More than 2.5x higher pixel rate | |||
Better floating-point performance | 2,308.1 GFLOPS | vs | 1,152 GFLOPS | More than 2x better floating-point performance | |||
Higher memory bandwidth | 112.2 GB/s | vs | 72 GB/s | More than 55% higher memory bandwidth | |||
Higher turbo clock speed | 1,178 MHz | vs | 925 MHz | More than 25% higher turbo clock speed | |||
Significantly higher memory clock speed | 1,753 MHz | vs | 1,125 MHz | More than 55% higher memory clock speed | |||
Higher texture rate | 72.1 GTexel/s | vs | 36 GTexel/s | More than 2x higher texture rate | |||
More render output processors | 32 | vs | 16 | Twice as many render output processors | |||
More shading units | 1,024 | vs | 640 | 384 more shading units | |||
More texture mapping units | 64 | vs | 40 | 24 more texture mapping units |
Features Key features of the Radeon R9 A375 vs GeForce GTX 960
memory bandwidth Rate at which data can be read from or stored in onboard memory
Radeon R9 A375
72 GB/s
GeForce GTX 960
112.2 GB/s
pixel rate Number of pixels a graphics card can render to the screen every second
Radeon R9 A375
14.4 GPixel/s
GeForce GTX 960
36.1 GPixel/s
texture rate Speed at which a graphics card can perform texture mapping
Radeon R9 A375
36 GTexel/s
GeForce GTX 960
72.1 GTexel/s
floating point performance How fast the gpu can crunch numbers
Radeon R9 A375
1,152 GFLOPS
GeForce GTX 960
2,308.1 GFLOPS
shading units Subcomponents of the gpu, these run in parallel to enable fast pixel shading
Radeon R9 A375
640
GeForce GTX 960
1,024
texture mapping units Built into each gpu, these resize and rotate bitmaps for texturing scenes
Specifications Full list of technical specs
gpu | Radeon R9 A375 | vs | GeForce GTX 960 |
---|---|---|---|
GPU brand | AMD | Nvidia | |
GPU name | Venus | GM206 | |
Clock speed | 900 MHz | 1,127 MHz | |
Turbo clock speed | 925 MHz | 1,178 MHz | |
Is dual GPU | No | No | |
Reference card | None | None | |
raw performance | |||
Shading units | 640 | 1,024 | |
Texture mapping units | 40 | 64 | |
Render output processors | 16 | 32 | |
Pixel rate | 14.4 GPixel/s | 36.1 GPixel/s | |
Texture rate | 36 GTexel/s | 72.1 GTexel/s | |
Floating-point performance | 1,152 GFLOPS | 2,308.1 GFLOPS |
memory | Radeon R9 A375 | vs | GeForce GTX 960 |
---|---|---|---|
Memory clock speed | 1,125 MHz | 1,753 MHz | |
Effective memory clock speed | 4,500 MHz | 7,012 MHz | |
Memory bus | 128 bit | 128 bit | |
Memory | 2,048 MB | 2,048 MB | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 | |
Memory bandwidth | 72 GB/s | 112.2 GB/s |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
970 vs 960 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
1050 Ti vs 960 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
R9 380 vs 960 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$274 | ||
750 Ti vs 960 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
760 vs 960 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
770 vs 960 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
1050 vs 960 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$304 | ||
1050 Ti vs 1060 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
1050 Ti vs 970 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$304 | ||
1060 vs 970 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
960 vs 970 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
1050 Ti vs 960 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$274 | ||
960 vs 750 Ti | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$304 | ||
RX 580 vs 1060 | ||