GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of R9 FURY X vs 1080 among Desktop GPUs

Gaming

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more

Graphics

T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more

Computing

Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more

Performance per Watt

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Value

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Noise and Power

TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more

8.3

Overall Score

Winner
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 

GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080  based on its noise and power.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Radeon R9 FURY X

Reasons to consider the
AMD Radeon R9 FURY X

Report a correction
Much higher memory bandwidth 512 GB/s vs 224.4 GB/s More than 2.2x higher memory bandwidth
Much wider memory bus 4,096 bit vs 256 bit 16x wider memory bus
Many more shading units 4,096 vs 2,560 1536 more shading units
Many more texture mapping units 256 vs 160 96 more texture mapping units
Front view of GeForce GTX 1080

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080

Report a correction
Much higher effective memory clock speed 10,008 MHz vs 1,000 MHz More than 10x higher effective memory clock speed
Much higher clock speed 1,607 MHz vs 1,050 MHz Around 55% higher clock speed
Significantly more memory 8,192 MB vs 4,096 MB 2x more memory
Significantly higher pixel rate 102.8 GPixel/s vs 67.2 GPixel/s Around 55% higher pixel rate
Much higher turbo clock speed 1,733 MHz vs 1,050 MHz More than 65% higher turbo clock speed
Much higher metro: last light framerate 131.6 vs 37 More than 3.5x higher metro: last light framerate
Much higher memory clock speed 1,251 MHz vs 500 MHz More than 2.5x higher memory clock speed
Better cloud gate factor score 26.05 vs 22.45 More than 15% better cloud gate factor score
Significantly lower TDP 180W vs 275W Around 35% lower TDP

Benchmarks Real world tests of Radeon R9 FURY X vs GeForce GTX 1080

Fire Strike Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Sky Diver Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Cloud Gate Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Metro: Last Light

Comments

Showing 6 comments.
The Fury X is massively underutilized. If games fully used this GPU the GTX 1080 would lag behind. That situation never happens though
my gues is that they hit a memory limitation with only 4gig VRAM. if you do that you get a heavy penalty.
so no really much adventage whit the monstrosous bandwich in the r9 right?
yeah must be something wrong there.
This seems off to me. Metro: Last Light only gets under 40 FPS average on a Fury X?
EVGA 1080 SC omg
comments powered by Disqus