GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of R9 FURY X vs 980 Ti among Desktop GPUs

Gaming

Radeon R9 FURY X
7.4
GeForce GTX 980 Ti
9.2
GeForce GTX 1070
8.9
Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more

Graphics

Radeon R9 FURY X
8.9
GeForce GTX 980 Ti
6.6
GeForce GTX 1070
9.7
T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more

Computing

Radeon R9 FURY X
n.d.
GeForce GTX 980 Ti
9.0
GeForce GTX 1070
9.3
Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more

Performance per Watt

Radeon R9 FURY X
7.8
GeForce GTX 980 Ti
8.1
GeForce GTX 1070
10.0
Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Value

Radeon R9 FURY X
n.d.
GeForce GTX 980 Ti
n.d.
GeForce GTX 1070
n.d.
Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Noise and Power

Radeon R9 FURY X
7.7
GeForce GTX 980 Ti
7.9
GeForce GTX 1070
8.8
TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more
8.3

Overall Score

Radeon R9 FURY X
8.2
GeForce GTX 980 Ti
8.3
GeForce GTX 1070
9.6

Winner
Nvidia GeForce GTX 980 Ti 

GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce GTX 980 Ti  based on its .

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

AMD Radeon R9 FURY X

Front view of Radeon R9 FURY X
Front view of GeForce GTX 980 Ti

Nvidia GeForce GTX 980 Ti

Join the discussion

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Radeon R9 FURY X

Reasons to consider the
AMD Radeon R9 FURY X

Report a correction
Much wider memory bus 4,096 bit vs 384 bit Around 10.8x wider memory bus
Significantly better floating-point performance 8,602 GFLOPS vs 5,632 GFLOPS Around 55% better floating-point performance
Significantly higher texture rate 268.8 GTexel/s vs 176 GTexel/s Around 55% higher texture rate
Significantly more shading units 4,096 vs 2,816 1280 more shading units
Significantly more texture mapping units 256 vs 176 80 more texture mapping units
Front view of GeForce GTX 980 Ti

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX 980 Ti

Report a correction
Much higher effective memory clock speed 7,012 MHz vs 1,000 MHz More than 7x higher effective memory clock speed
More memory 6,144 MB vs 4,096 MB 50% more memory
Much higher memory clock speed 1,753 MHz vs 500 MHz More than 3.5x higher memory clock speed
Higher pixel rate 96 GPixel/s vs 67.2 GPixel/s Around 45% higher pixel rate
Significantly more render output processors 96 vs 64 32 more render output processors
Much higher metro: last light framerate 119 vs 37 Around 3.2x higher metro: last light framerate
Better cloud gate factor score 23.42 vs 22.45 Around 5% better cloud gate factor score
Lower TDP 250W vs 275W Around 10% lower TDP

Benchmarks Real world tests of Radeon R9 FURY X vs GeForce GTX 980 Ti

Fire Strike Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Radeon R9 FURY X
85.91
GeForce GTX 980 Ti
85.93

Sky Diver Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Radeon R9 FURY X
449.13
GeForce GTX 980 Ti
475.41

Cloud Gate Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Radeon R9 FURY X
22.45
GeForce GTX 980 Ti
23.42

Metro: Last Light

Radeon R9 FURY X
37
GeForce GTX 980 Ti
119

Reviews Word on the street

Radeon R9 FURY X  vs GeForce GTX 980 Ti 
9.2
read review
9.5
read review

Comments

Showing 2 comments.
Brandon (02:37 AM, May 28, 2017)
I wish I could have picked up a Fury X for a good price, no one seems to have them. Got a 980 TI today for 220. My AIO 390X is sitting in it's box for a while.
jeremy (05:07 PM, May 12, 2017)
my Fury X is way faster than my buddys 980ti. I cant figure out why everyone says the 980 is faster... Im always around 2-15% faster than him in everything we've ever ran.
comments powered by Disqus

features

information

  • terms and privacy
  • about
  • blog

on the web

GPUBoss