GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of R9 FURY X vs TITAN X among Desktop GPUs over $400

Gaming

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more

Graphics

T-Rex, Manhattan, Sky Diver Factor and Fire Strike Factor

Computing

Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more

Performance per Watt

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 31 more

Value

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 31 more

Noise and Power

TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more

Winner
Nvidia GeForce GTX TITAN X 

GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce GTX TITAN X  based on its noise and power.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Radeon R9 FURY X

Reasons to consider the
AMD Radeon R9 FURY X

Report a correction
Better floating-point performance 8,602 GFLOPS vs 6,144 GFLOPS More than 40% better floating-point performance
Much wider memory bus 4,096 bit vs 384 bit Around 10.8x wider memory bus
Higher texture rate 268.8 GTexel/s vs 192 GTexel/s More than 40% higher texture rate
More shading units 4,096 vs 3,072 1024 more shading units
More texture mapping units 256 vs 192 64 more texture mapping units
Front view of GeForce GTX TITAN X

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX TITAN X

Report a correction
Much more memory 12,288 MB vs 4,096 MB 3x more memory
Much higher effective memory clock speed 7,012 MHz vs 1,000 MHz More than 7x higher effective memory clock speed
Higher pixel rate 96 GPixel/s vs 67.2 GPixel/s Around 45% higher pixel rate
Much higher memory clock speed 1,753 MHz vs 500 MHz More than 3.5x higher memory clock speed
Significantly more render output processors 96 vs 64 32 more render output processors
Lower TDP 250W vs 275W Around 10% lower TDP

Features Key features of the Radeon R9 FURY X  vs GeForce GTX TITAN X 

pixel rate Number of pixels a graphics card can render to the screen every second

Radeon R9 FURY X
67.2 GPixel/s
GeForce GTX TITAN X
96 GPixel/s

texture rate Speed at which a graphics card can perform texture mapping

Radeon R9 FURY X
268.8 GTexel/s
GeForce GTX TITAN X
192 GTexel/s

floating point performance How fast the gpu can crunch numbers

Radeon R9 FURY X
8,602 GFLOPS
GeForce GTX TITAN X
6,144 GFLOPS

shading units Subcomponents of the gpu, these run in parallel to enable fast pixel shading

texture mapping units Built into each gpu, these resize and rotate bitmaps for texturing scenes

render output processors GPU commponents responsible for transform pixels as they flow between memory buffers

Reviews Word on the street

Radeon R9 FURY X  vs GeForce GTX TITAN X 

9.2
8.8
Contrary to intuition, the driving factor for PCI-Express bus width and speed for most games is the framerate, not resolution, and our benchmarks conclusively show that the performance difference between PCIe configurations shrinks at higher resolutions.
Radeon R9 FURY X

Specifications Full list of technical specs

gpu

Radeon R9 FURY X  vs
GeForce GTX TITAN X 
GPU brand AMD Nvidia
GPU name Fiji GM200
Market Desktop Desktop
Clock speed 1,050 MHz 1,000 MHz
Turbo clock speed 1,050 MHz 1,089 MHz
Is dual GPU No No
Reference card None None

noise and power

TDP 275W 250W

memory

Radeon R9 FURY X  vs
GeForce GTX TITAN X 
Memory clock speed 500 MHz 1,753 MHz
Effective memory clock speed 1,000 MHz 7,012 MHz
Memory bus 4,096 bit 384 bit
Memory 4,096 MB 12,288 MB

raw performance

Shading units 4,096 3,072
Texture mapping units 256 192
Render output processors 64 96
Pixel rate 67.2 GPixel/s 96 GPixel/s
Texture rate 268.8 GTexel/s 192 GTexel/s
Floating-point performance 8,602 GFLOPS 6,144 GFLOPS

Comments

comments powered by Disqus