0 Comments
| Radeon R9 FURY X2 vs GeForce GTX 1080 |
VS
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Much wider memory bus | 8,192 bit | vs | 256 bit | 32x wider memory bus | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Is dual GPU | Yes | vs | No | About half of graphics cards are dual GPU | |||
Much better floating-point performance | 17,204 GFLOPS | vs | 8,228 GFLOPS | More than 2x better floating-point performance | |||
Many more shading units | 8,192 | vs | 2,560 | 5632 more shading units | |||
Many more texture mapping units | 512 | vs | 160 | 352 more texture mapping units | |||
Many more render output processors | 128 | vs | 64 | Twice as many render output processors | |||
Higher pixel rate | 134.4 GPixel/s | vs | 102.8 GPixel/s | More than 30% higher pixel rate | |||
| |||||||
Much higher effective memory clock speed | 10,008 MHz | vs | 1,000 MHz | More than 10x higher effective memory clock speed | |||
Much higher clock speed | 1,607 MHz | vs | 1,050 MHz | Around 55% higher clock speed | |||
Significantly better PassMark score | 11,994 | vs | 8,345 | Around 45% better PassMark score | |||
Much higher memory clock speed | 1,251 MHz | vs | 500 MHz | More than 2.5x higher memory clock speed | |||
Much better PassMark direct compute score | 8,106 | vs | 4,880 | More than 65% better PassMark direct compute score | |||
Better particle simulation score | 1,558.04 mInteraction/s | vs | 1,194.57 mInteraction/s | More than 30% better particle simulation score |
Benchmarks Real world tests of Radeon R9 FURY X2 vs GeForce GTX 1080
PassMark Industry standard benchmark for overall graphics card performanceData courtesy Passmark
Radeon R9 FURY X2
8,345
GeForce GTX 1080
11,994
Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench
Radeon R9 FURY X2
932.66 mHash/s
GeForce GTX 1080
755 mHash/s
Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench
Radeon R9 FURY X2
143.04 mPixels/s
GeForce GTX 1080
143.9 mPixels/s
Ocean surface simulation Data courtesy CompuBench
Radeon R9 FURY X2
3,404.53 frames/s
GeForce GTX 1080
2,733.78 frames/s
Particle simulation Data courtesy CompuBench
Radeon R9 FURY X2
1,194.57 mInteraction/s
GeForce GTX 1080
1,558.04 mInteraction/s
T-Rex (Compubench 1.5) Data courtesy CompuBench
Radeon R9 FURY X2
12.49 frames/s
GeForce GTX 1080
13.78 frames/s
Video composition Data courtesy CompuBench
Radeon R9 FURY X2
140.63 frames/s
GeForce GTX 1080
156.25 frames/s
PassMark Direct Compute Measures performance of general-purpose computing using Microsoft DirectCompute
Radeon R9 FURY X2
4,880
GeForce GTX 1080
8,106
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
1080 vs 1080 Ti | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
1080 vs 1070 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
1080 vs RX 580 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
1080 vs RTX 2070 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
1080 vs TITAN X | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$280 | ||
1080 vs 1060 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
1080 vs 980 Ti | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$280 | ||
1060 vs 1050 Ti | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$280 | ||
970 vs 1060 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
970 vs 1050 Ti | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
970 vs 960 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$280 | ||
1060 vs RX 580 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
960 vs 1050 Ti | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$274 | ||
750 Ti vs 960 | ||