Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Radeon R9 FURY X2

Reasons to consider the
AMD Radeon R9 FURY X2

Report a correction
Much wider memory bus 8,192 bit vs 256 bit 32x wider memory bus
Is dual GPU Yes vs No About half of graphics cards are dual GPU
Much better floating-point performance 17,204 GFLOPS vs 8,228 GFLOPS More than 2x better floating-point performance
Many more shading units 8,192 vs 2,560 5632 more shading units
Many more texture mapping units 512 vs 160 352 more texture mapping units
Many more render output processors 128 vs 64 Twice as many render output processors
Higher pixel rate 134.4 GPixel/s vs 102.8 GPixel/s More than 30% higher pixel rate
Front view of GeForce GTX 1080

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080

Report a correction
Much higher effective memory clock speed 10,008 MHz vs 1,000 MHz More than 10x higher effective memory clock speed
Much higher clock speed 1,607 MHz vs 1,050 MHz Around 55% higher clock speed
Significantly better PassMark score 11,994 vs 8,345 Around 45% better PassMark score
Much higher memory clock speed 1,251 MHz vs 500 MHz More than 2.5x higher memory clock speed
Much better PassMark direct compute score 8,106 vs 4,880 More than 65% better PassMark direct compute score
Better particle simulation score 1,558.04 mInteraction/s vs 1,194.57 mInteraction/s More than 30% better particle simulation score

Benchmarks Real world tests of Radeon R9 FURY X2 vs GeForce GTX 1080

PassMark Industry standard benchmark for overall graphics card performanceData courtesy Passmark

Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon R9 FURY X2
932.66 mHash/s
GeForce GTX 1080
755 mHash/s

Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon R9 FURY X2
143.04 mPixels/s
GeForce GTX 1080
143.9 mPixels/s

Ocean surface simulation Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon R9 FURY X2
3,404.53 frames/s
GeForce GTX 1080
2,733.78 frames/s

Particle simulation Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon R9 FURY X2
1,194.57 mInteraction/s
GeForce GTX 1080
1,558.04 mInteraction/s

T-Rex (Compubench 1.5) Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon R9 FURY X2
12.49 frames/s
GeForce GTX 1080
13.78 frames/s

Video composition Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon R9 FURY X2
140.63 frames/s
GeForce GTX 1080
156.25 frames/s

PassMark Direct Compute Measures performance of general-purpose computing using Microsoft DirectCompute

Comments

comments powered by Disqus