Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Radeon R9 FURY X2

Reasons to consider the
AMD Radeon R9 FURY X2

Report a correction
Much wider memory bus 8,192 bit vs 768 bit Around 10.8x wider memory bus
Much better floating-point performance 17,204 GFLOPS vs 10,092 GFLOPS More than 70% better floating-point performance
Significantly higher clock speed 1,050 MHz vs 705 MHz Around 50% higher clock speed
Many more shading units 8,192 vs 5,760 2432 more shading units
Higher pixel rate 134.4 GPixel/s vs 105.12 GPixel/s Around 30% higher pixel rate
Significantly more render output processors 128 vs 96 32 more render output processors
Slightly better PassMark score 8,345 vs 7,752 Around 10% better PassMark score
Better particle simulation score 1,194.57 mInteraction/s vs 844.6 mInteraction/s More than 40% better particle simulation score
More texture mapping units 512 vs 480 32 more texture mapping units
Better PassMark direct compute score 4,880 vs 3,418 Around 45% better PassMark direct compute score
Front view of GeForce GTX TITAN Z

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX TITAN Z

Report a correction
Much higher effective memory clock speed 7,000 MHz vs 1,000 MHz 7x higher effective memory clock speed
Significantly more memory 12,288 MB vs 8,192 MB 50% more memory
Much higher memory clock speed 1,750 MHz vs 500 MHz 3.5x higher memory clock speed

Benchmarks Real world tests of Radeon R9 FURY X2 vs GeForce GTX TITAN Z

PassMark Industry standard benchmark for overall graphics card performanceData courtesy Passmark

Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon R9 FURY X2
932.66 mHash/s
GeForce GTX TITAN Z
332.46 mHash/s

Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon R9 FURY X2
143.04 mPixels/s
GeForce GTX TITAN Z
79.68 mPixels/s

Ocean surface simulation Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon R9 FURY X2
3,404.53 frames/s
GeForce GTX TITAN Z
1,933.42 frames/s

Particle simulation Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon R9 FURY X2
1,194.57 mInteraction/s
GeForce GTX TITAN Z
844.6 mInteraction/s

T-Rex (Compubench 1.5) Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon R9 FURY X2
12.49 frames/s
GeForce GTX TITAN Z
7.65 frames/s

Video composition Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon R9 FURY X2
140.63 frames/s
GeForce GTX TITAN Z
83.61 frames/s

PassMark Direct Compute Measures performance of general-purpose computing using Microsoft DirectCompute

Comments

comments powered by Disqus