0 Comments
| Radeon R9 FURY X2 vs Pro Duo |
VS
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Better floating-point performance | 17,204 GFLOPS | vs | 16,384 GFLOPS | More than 5% better floating-point performance | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Better particle simulation score | 1,194.57 mInteraction/s | vs | 851.43 mInteraction/s | More than 40% better particle simulation score | |||
| |||||||
Better PassMark score | 9,484 | vs | 8,345 | Around 15% better PassMark score | |||
Slightly better PassMark direct compute score | 5,267 | vs | 4,880 | Around 10% better PassMark direct compute score |
Benchmarks Real world tests of Radeon R9 FURY X2 vs Pro Duo
PassMark Industry standard benchmark for overall graphics card performanceData courtesy Passmark
Radeon R9 FURY X2
8,345
Radeon Pro Duo
9,484
Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench
Radeon R9 FURY X2
932.66 mHash/s
Radeon Pro Duo
593.55 mHash/s
Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench
Radeon R9 FURY X2
143.04 mPixels/s
Radeon Pro Duo
141.99 mPixels/s
Ocean surface simulation Data courtesy CompuBench
Radeon R9 FURY X2
3,404.53 frames/s
Radeon Pro Duo
1,917.78 frames/s
Particle simulation Data courtesy CompuBench
Radeon R9 FURY X2
1,194.57 mInteraction/s
Radeon Pro Duo
851.43 mInteraction/s
T-Rex (Compubench 1.5) Data courtesy CompuBench
Radeon R9 FURY X2
12.49 frames/s
Radeon Pro Duo
13.15 frames/s
Video composition Data courtesy CompuBench
Radeon R9 FURY X2
140.63 frames/s
Radeon Pro Duo
120.56 frames/s
PassMark Direct Compute Measures performance of general-purpose computing using Microsoft DirectCompute
Radeon R9 FURY X2
4,880
Radeon Pro Duo
5,267
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
Popular Comparisons
Comments
Showing 2 comments.
kevmolio (04:16 AM, March 20, 2018)
SNP (07:22 AM, August 28, 2016)