GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of R9 FURY vs 1060 among Desktop GPUs

Gaming

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more

Graphics

T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more

Computing

Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more

Performance per Watt

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Value

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Noise and Power

TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more

9.4

Overall Score

Winner
MSI GeForce GTX 1060 

GPUBoss recommends the MSI GeForce GTX 1060  based on its benchmarks and noise and power.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Radeon R9 FURY

Reasons to consider the
AMD Radeon R9 FURY

Report a correction
Much higher memory bandwidth 512 GB/s vs 192.2 GB/s Around 2.8x higher memory bandwidth
Significantly better floating-point performance 7,168 GFLOPS vs 3,953 GFLOPS More than 80% better floating-point performance
Significantly higher texture rate 224 GTexel/s vs 123.5 GTexel/s More than 80% higher texture rate
Many more shading units 3,584 vs 1,280 2304 more shading units
Many more texture mapping units 224 vs 80 144 more texture mapping units
Much wider memory bus 4,096 bit vs 192 bit More than 21.2x wider memory bus
More render output processors 64 vs 48 16 more render output processors
Front view of GeForce GTX 1060

Reasons to consider the
MSI GeForce GTX 1060

Report a correction
Much higher effective memory clock speed 8,008 MHz vs 1,000 MHz More than 8x higher effective memory clock speed
Significantly higher clock speed 1,544 MHz vs 1,000 MHz Around 55% higher clock speed
More memory 6,144 MB vs 4,096 MB 50% more memory
Better PassMark score 8,686 vs 7,293 Around 20% better PassMark score
Much better manhattan score 26,875.7 vs 3,713.8 Around 7.2x better manhattan score
Much higher memory clock speed 2,002 MHz vs 500 MHz More than 4x higher memory clock speed
Higher pixel rate 74.1 GPixel/s vs 64 GPixel/s More than 15% higher pixel rate
Better face detection score 158.5 mPixels/s vs 142.84 mPixels/s More than 10% better face detection score
Much lower TDP 120W vs 275W 2.3x lower TDP

Benchmarks Real world tests of Radeon R9 FURY vs GeForce GTX 1060

Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon R9 FURY
804.66 mHash/s
GeForce GTX 1060
580.23 mHash/s

Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon R9 FURY
142.84 mPixels/s
GeForce GTX 1060
158.5 mPixels/s

Ocean surface simulation Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon R9 FURY
3,649.18 frames/s
GeForce GTX 1060
1,766.04 frames/s

Particle simulation Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon R9 FURY
1,050.51 mInteraction/s
GeForce GTX 1060
981.4 mInteraction/s

T-Rex (Compubench 1.5) Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon R9 FURY
13.45 frames/s
GeForce GTX 1060
8.82 frames/s

Video composition Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon R9 FURY
142.75 frames/s
GeForce GTX 1060
27.13 frames/s

T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

Manhattan (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon R9 FURY
3,713.8
GeForce GTX 1060
26,875.7

Comments

Showing 4 comments.
Well it all depends what you need it to do. Seeing how the Sapphire Radeon NITRO R9 Fury is going on Amazon for $254.99, Its a win win.
Maybe my eyesight aren't the best anymore, but it seems like the Fury won? On the other hand, there is no way to go wrong with either of them. They are head to head by hairline differences.
i m looking at the same thing man, i think if u have good cooling and good enought power supply for fury take it, if not take 1060...
Sapphire Radeon NITRO R9 FURY 4G HBM with Back Plate (1050Mhz) for 333,- EU (so it this version has 50 mhz more than above) or MSI GeForce GTX 1060 Gaming X 6G for 340,- (so has 6gb! nor 3gb) prices my country! above benchmarks when it comes to games seem to be won by the Fury saw a youtbe vid between 1060 and fury: won by fury but different versions What do you think?
comments powered by Disqus