Winner
GeForce GTX 1070
GPUBoss recommends the GeForce GTX 1070 based on its benchmarks and noise and power.
See full details Radeon R9 FURY vs GeForce GTX 1070 |
Released July, 2015
AMD Radeon R9 FURY
- 1 GHz
- 4 GB
7.6 Out of 10
by techPowerUp!I'm also not sure if there is any benefit at all from overclocking HBM memory because bandwidth seems plenty.
VS
Released June, 2016
Generic GeForce GTX 1070
- 1.5 GHz
- 8 GB GDDR5
8.8 Out of 10
by Ryan-Shrout (May, 2016)The 1920 core count is still higher than the GTX 970 (1664), and with a significantly higher clock speed there is no doubt which card is going to be faster.
GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of R9 FURY vs 1070 among Desktop GPUs
Gaming | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more | |
Graphics | |
| | |
| T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more | |
Computing | |
| | |
| Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more | |
Performance per Watt | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more | |
Value | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more | |
Noise and Power | |
| | |
| TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more | |
| 8.8 | Overall Score |
| | |
 | Winner |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Much higher memory bandwidth | 512 GB/s | vs | 256.3 GB/s | Around 2x higher memory bandwidth | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Much wider memory bus | 4,096 bit | vs | 256 bit | 16x wider memory bus | |||
| Many more shading units | 3,584 | vs | 1,920 | 1664 more shading units | |||
| Many more texture mapping units | 224 | vs | 120 | 104 more texture mapping units | |||
| Better floating-point performance | 7,168 GFLOPS | vs | 5,783 GFLOPS | Around 25% better floating-point performance | |||
| Higher texture rate | 224 GTexel/s | vs | 180.7 GTexel/s | Around 25% higher texture rate | |||
| |||||||
| Much higher effective memory clock speed | 8,008 MHz | vs | 1,000 MHz | More than 8x higher effective memory clock speed | |||
| Significantly higher clock speed | 1,506 MHz | vs | 1,000 MHz | More than 50% higher clock speed | |||
| Significantly better PassMark score | 11,028 | vs | 7,293 | More than 50% better PassMark score | |||
| Significantly more memory | 8,192 MB | vs | 4,096 MB | 2x more memory | |||
| Much higher memory clock speed | 2,002 MHz | vs | 500 MHz | More than 4x higher memory clock speed | |||
| Higher pixel rate | 96.4 GPixel/s | vs | 64 GPixel/s | More than 50% higher pixel rate | |||
| Better fire strike factor score | 87.79 | vs | 80.31 | Around 10% better fire strike factor score | |||
| Better T-Rex score | 6,704.56 | vs | 3,361 | Around 2x better T-Rex score | |||
| Higher crysis 3 framerate | 77.15 | vs | 64.5 | Around 20% higher crysis 3 framerate | |||
| Much lower TDP | 150W | vs | 275W | More than 45% lower TDP | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of Radeon R9 FURY vs GeForce GTX 1070
Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench
Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench
T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench
Manhattan (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench
Fire Strike Factor Data courtesy FutureMark
Sky Diver Factor Data courtesy FutureMark
Battlefield 4
Crysis 3
Desktops
Looking for a desktop?
- 2 desktops with the Radeon R9 FURY, starting from $2,150
- 71 desktops with the GeForce GTX 1070, starting from $1,125
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
Popular Comparisons
Read more
Comments
Showing 1 comment.
