GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of R9 FURY vs 7950 among Desktop GPUs

Gaming

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more

Graphics

T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more

Computing

Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more

Performance per Watt

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Value

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Noise and Power

TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more

8.2

Overall Score

Winner
AMD Radeon R9 FURY 

GPUBoss recommends the AMD Radeon R9 FURY  based on its benchmarks.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Radeon R9 FURY

Reasons to consider the
AMD Radeon R9 FURY

Report a correction
Much better 3DMark 11 graphics score 36,041 vs 9,290 Around 4x better 3DMark 11 graphics score
Much wider memory bus 4,096 bit vs 384 bit Around 10.8x wider memory bus
Much higher memory bandwidth 512 GB/s vs 240 GB/s Around 2.2x higher memory bandwidth
Significantly better 3DMark vantage graphics score 47,402 vs 31,710 Around 50% better 3DMark vantage graphics score
Much better floating-point performance 7,168 GFLOPS vs 2,867.2 GFLOPS More than 2.5x better floating-point performance
Better PassMark score 7,293 vs 4,764 Around 55% better PassMark score
Much better manhattan score 8,902.42 vs 3,712.14 Around 2.5x better manhattan score
Much higher texture rate 224 GTexel/s vs 89.6 GTexel/s More than 2.5x higher texture rate
Higher clock speed 1,000 MHz vs 800 MHz 25% higher clock speed
Significantly higher pixel rate 64 GPixel/s vs 25.6 GPixel/s Around 2.5x higher pixel rate
Many more shading units 3,584 vs 1,792 Twice as many shading units
Many more texture mapping units 224 vs 112 Twice as many texture mapping units
Significantly more render output processors 64 vs 32 Twice as many render output processors
Many more compute units 56 vs 28 Twice as many compute units
More memory 4,096 MB vs 3,072 MB Around 35% more memory
Significantly better particle simulation score 1,040.88 mInteraction/s vs 514.33 mInteraction/s More than 2x better particle simulation score
Much higher battlefield 4 framerate 101 vs 33.5 More than 3x higher battlefield 4 framerate
Slightly better cloud gate factor score 21.49 vs 20.6 Around 5% better cloud gate factor score
Front view of Radeon HD 7950

Reasons to consider the
AMD Radeon HD 7950

Report a correction
Much higher effective memory clock speed 5,000 MHz vs 1,000 MHz 5x higher effective memory clock speed
Much higher memory clock speed 1,250 MHz vs 500 MHz 2.5x higher memory clock speed
Lower TDP 200W vs 275W More than 25% lower TDP

Benchmarks Real world tests of Radeon R9 FURY vs HD 7950

Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon R9 FURY
800.97 mHash/s
Radeon HD 7950
343.44 mHash/s

Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon R9 FURY
142.57 mPixels/s
Radeon HD 7950
77.81 mPixels/s

T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon R9 FURY
3,358.22
Radeon HD 7950
3,355.86

Manhattan (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon R9 FURY
8,902.42
Radeon HD 7950
3,712.14

Fire Strike Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Sky Diver Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Battlefield 4

Crysis 3

Reviews Word on the street

Radeon R9 FURY  vs HD 7950 

9.2
9.1
Things don't look as good versus the GTX 980, though, as even the NVIDIA GTX 980 reference design is much quieter and custom designs offer a near-noiseless gaming experience; I'm thinking of ASUS GTX 980 STRIX and MSI GTX 980 Gaming.
Radeon R9 FURY

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus