Winner
AMD Radeon R9 M265X
GPUBoss recommends the AMD Radeon R9 M265X based on its gaming and compute performance.
See full details | Radeon R9 M265X vs GeForce GT 740M |
Gaming | |
| |
Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more |
Graphics | |
| |
T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more |
Computing | |
| |
Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more |
Performance per Watt | |
| |
Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more |
Value | |
| |
Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more |
Noise and Power | |
| |
TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more |
5.9 | Overall Score |
| |
Winner |
AMD Radeon R9 M265XGPUBoss Winner | ![]() | |
| |||||||
Significantly better 3DMark 11 graphics score | 15,426 | vs | 1,873 | Around 8.2x better 3DMark 11 graphics score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Much better T-Rex score | 3,358.76 | vs | 3,334 | Almost the same | |||
Much higher hitman: absolution framerate | 14.5 | vs | 6.35 | More than 2.2x higher hitman: absolution framerate | |||
Better PassMark score | 1,280 | vs | 772 | More than 65% better PassMark score | |||
Higher effective memory clock speed | 4,000 MHz | vs | 1,802 MHz | Around 2.2x higher effective memory clock speed | |||
Better 3DMark vantage graphics score | 9,135 | vs | 5,459 | More than 65% better 3DMark vantage graphics score | |||
Higher memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | vs | 28.83 GB/s | Around 2.2x higher memory bandwidth | |||
Better T-Rex score | 2.17 frames/s | vs | 0.87 frames/s | More than 2.5x better T-Rex score | |||
Higher crysis 3 framerate | 9.85 fps | vs | 7.4 fps | Around 35% higher crysis 3 framerate | |||
More shading units | 640 | vs | 384 | 256 more shading units | |||
Higher BioShock infinite framerate | 19.4 fps | vs | 9.2 fps | More than 2x higher BioShock infinite framerate | |||
Higher diablo III framerate | 50.9 fps | vs | 46.2 fps | More than 10% higher diablo III framerate | |||
Higher memory clock speed | 1,000 MHz | vs | 901 MHz | More than 10% higher memory clock speed | |||
| |||||||
Much better 3DMark06 score | 10,161 | vs | 2,633 | More than 3.8x better 3DMark06 score | |||
Higher clock speed | 810 MHz | vs | 575 MHz | More than 40% higher clock speed |
Looking for a laptop?
![]() | VS | ![]() |
740M vs 840M | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
740M vs 820M | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
740M vs 8750M | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
740M vs 8670M | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
740M vs 750M | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
740M vs R7 M265 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
740M vs R5 M230 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$304 | ||
1060 vs 1050 Ti | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
970 vs 960 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$304 | ||
970 vs 1060 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
960 vs R9 380 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
970 vs R9 390 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
R9 290X vs 970 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$274 | ||
750 Ti vs 960 | ||