Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Radeon R9 M270X

Reasons to consider the
AMD Radeon R9 M270X

Report a correction
Much better T-Rex score 3,361.82 vs 3,353.98 Almost the same
Better face detection score 63.98 mPixels/s vs 54.29 mPixels/s Around 20% better face detection score
Higher memory clock speed 1,375 MHz vs 1,253 MHz Around 10% higher memory clock speed
Front view of GeForce GTX 960M

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX 960M

Report a correction
Much better 3DMark 11 graphics score 23,777.5 vs 8,520 More than 2.8x better 3DMark 11 graphics score
Higher clock speed 1,097 MHz vs 900 MHz More than 20% higher clock speed
Better PassMark score 2,043 vs 1,450 More than 40% better PassMark score
Better 3DMark06 score 5,277 vs 3,261 More than 60% better 3DMark06 score
Higher turbo clock speed 1,176 MHz vs 1,000 MHz Around 20% higher turbo clock speed
Better PassMark direct compute score 1,479 vs 1,062 Around 40% better PassMark direct compute score

Benchmarks Real world tests of Radeon R9 M270X vs GeForce GTX 960M

Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon R9 M270X
314.57 mHash/s
GeForce GTX 960M
174.57 mHash/s

Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon R9 M270X
63.98 mPixels/s
GeForce GTX 960M
54.29 mPixels/s

Ocean surface simulation Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon R9 M270X
1,314.72 frames/s
GeForce GTX 960M
795.24 frames/s

Particle simulation Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon R9 M270X
377.8 mInteraction/s
GeForce GTX 960M
578.1 mInteraction/s

T-Rex (Compubench 1.5) Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon R9 M270X
6.37 frames/s
GeForce GTX 960M
3.69 frames/s

Video composition Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon R9 M270X
85.21 frames/s
GeForce GTX 960M
51.97 frames/s

T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon R9 M270X
3,361.82
GeForce GTX 960M
3,353.98

Manhattan (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus