Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!

AMD Radeon R9 M275

GPUBoss Winner
Front view of Radeon R9 M275

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Radeon R9 M275

Reasons to consider the
AMD Radeon R9 M275

Report a correction
Better 3DMark 11 graphics score 10,378 vs 2,543 More than 4x better 3DMark 11 graphics score
Slightly better PassMark score 1,498 vs 1,288 More than 15% better PassMark score
Slightly better floating-point performance 1,184 GFLOPS vs 722.7 GFLOPS Around 65% better floating-point performance
Slightly higher pixel rate 14.8 GPixel/s vs 7.53 GPixel/s More than 95% higher pixel rate
Better PassMark direct compute score 1,427 vs 733 Around 95% better PassMark direct compute score
More shading units 640 vs 384 256 more shading units
Front view of GeForce GT 750M

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GT 750M

Report a correction
Much better 3DMark06 score 13,670 vs 3,261 Around 4.2x better 3DMark06 score

Benchmarks Real world tests of Radeon R9 M275 vs GeForce GT 750M

PassMark Industry standard benchmark for overall graphics card performanceData courtesy Passmark

3DMark 11 Graphics Industry standard benchmark that tests DirectX 11 GPU performance

3DMark06 Industry standard benchmark that tests DirectX 9 GPU performance

BioShock Infinite 1920 x 1080 - Ultra preset + DX11 (DDOF)

Radeon R9 M275
14.4 fps
GeForce GT 750M
16.3 fps

PassMark Direct Compute Measures performance of general-purpose computing using Microsoft DirectCompute


Showing 5 comments.
Yes but not in most cases. This particular one has pretty bad drivers right now. It does DirectCompute and 3DMark11 and OpenCL already better than the 750M and has a much higher memory bandwidth so its clearly a more powerful card. I mean, just look at that floating point performance. So its clearly a driver problem or an overhead problem. Also, the R9 290x improved more than the NVIDIA card in terms of PERCENTAGE. The NVIDIA card improved a mear 150%. The AMD on the other hand did 417% better. If they were at even footing to begin with, like THESE TWO, the AMD card would have one. Compare percentage improvement: The AMD cards are clearly not optimized anywhere close to the NVIDIA and must have a lot of overhead for this much of an improvement,
Eh DX12 will make Nvidia's GPUs better as well.When you pair up a stock 8350/970 you get around 13.5 million draw calls which is more than R9 290x 12.7 million.In the states a 970 is a better deal than a 290x.
I've tried gaming on the R9 and it does perform better than most notebookcheck 750m game FPS. Plus it clearly does DirectCompute better and the newer 3D mark 11 benchmark better. And it does even better with mantle on Battlefield 4. So he's right. If it benefits from DX12 the same it does from Mantle, then its even better.
Well it is an "m" card and if you were comparing the desktop version of the R9 to the mobile version of the 750, you would be correct. But obviously the facts are right in front of you on why the R9 barely beats the 750. Have you even tried gaming on a 750m? If not, then don't "Automatic bullshit" this, sorry if your computer purchase isn't living up to the expectations you want it to be which is better than all the other graphics cards out there. There is a reason Nvidia cards are top of the world in regards to graphics cards.
This is automic bullshit, the radeon R9 is much better than the NVIDIA GT 750m.
comments powered by Disqus