0 Comments
| Radeon R9 M290X vs GeForce GTX 880M |
VS
GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of R9 M290X vs 880M among Laptop GPUs over 35W TDP
Gaming | |
| |
Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more |
Graphics | |
| |
T-Rex, Manhattan, Sky Diver Factor and Fire Strike Factor |
Computing | |
| |
Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more |
Performance per Watt | |
| |
Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 31 more |
Value | |
| |
Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 31 more |
Noise and Power | |
| |
TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more |
No winner declared
Too close to call
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Better PassMark score | 4,284 | vs | 3,577 | Around 20% better PassMark score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Lower TDP | 100W | vs | 122W | Around 20% lower TDP | |||
| |||||||
Much better T-Rex score | 3,359.5 | vs | 3,324.52 | Almost the same | |||
Significantly more memory | 8,192 MB | vs | 4,096 MB | 2x more memory | |||
Better 3DMark vantage graphics score | 29,582 | vs | 24,205 | More than 20% better 3DMark vantage graphics score | |||
Higher clock speed | 954 MHz | vs | 850 MHz | More than 10% higher clock speed | |||
Much better T-Rex score | 3.57 frames/s | vs | -1 frames/s | More than 450% better T-Rex score | |||
Higher texture rate | 122.1 GTexel/s | vs | 72 GTexel/s | Around 70% higher texture rate | |||
Much higher crysis 3 framerate | 33.2 fps | vs | 22.8 fps | More than 45% higher crysis 3 framerate | |||
Better floating-point performance | 2,930.7 GFLOPS | vs | 2,304 GFLOPS | More than 25% better floating-point performance | |||
More texture mapping units | 128 | vs | 80 | 48 more texture mapping units | |||
Higher BioShock infinite framerate | 65.6 fps | vs | 46.8 fps | More than 40% higher BioShock infinite framerate | |||
Higher turbo clock speed | 993 MHz | vs | 900 MHz | More than 10% higher turbo clock speed | |||
Higher metro: last light framerate | 42.4 | vs | 33.1 | Around 30% higher metro: last light framerate | |||
More shading units | 1,536 | vs | 1,280 | 256 more shading units |
Benchmarks Real world tests of Radeon R9 M290X vs GeForce GTX 880M
Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench
Radeon R9 M290X
258.05 mHash/s
GeForce GTX 880M
82.51 mHash/s
Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench
Radeon R9 M290X
54.52 mPixels/s
GeForce GTX 880M
41.2 mPixels/s
Ocean surface simulation Data courtesy CompuBench
Radeon R9 M290X
1,134.46 frames/s
GeForce GTX 880M
1,215.86 frames/s
T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench
Radeon R9 M290X
3,324.52
GeForce GTX 880M
3,359.5
Manhattan (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench
Radeon R9 M290X
2,047.22
GeForce GTX 880M
3,715.14
Thief
GeForce GTX 880M
40.15
Battlefield 4
Radeon R9 M290X
36.35
GeForce GTX 880M
46.2
Bioshock Infinite
Radeon R9 M290X
46.8
GeForce GTX 880M
65.6
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
970M vs 880M | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
780M vs 880M | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
980M vs 880M | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
870M vs 880M | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
960M vs 880M | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
860M vs R9 M290X | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
780M vs R9 M290X | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$304 | ||
1050 Ti vs 1060 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
1050 Ti vs 970 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$304 | ||
1060 vs 970 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
960 vs 970 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
1050 Ti vs 960 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$274 | ||
960 vs 750 Ti | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$274 | ||
950 vs 750 Ti | ||
Read more
Comments
Showing 8 comments.
Keith O'Reilly (07:58 PM, September 21, 2015)
Blastergamer (04:31 PM, July 2, 2014)
Tony (04:24 PM, June 24, 2014)
Mordorson (05:40 AM, June 24, 2014)
Jett Angeles (06:27 AM, June 13, 2014)
alex01230 (03:11 PM, May 10, 2014)
Blastergamer (12:07 PM, May 2, 2014)
Naruto ninja (06:48 PM, April 28, 2014)