Winner
AMD Radeon R9 M290X
GPUBoss recommends the AMD Radeon R9 M290X based on its benchmarks and compute performance.
See full details Radeon R9 M290X vs Pro 555 |
VS
GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of R9 M290X vs Pro 555 among all GPUs
Gaming | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more | |
Graphics | |
| | |
| T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more | |
Computing | |
| | |
| Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more | |
Performance per Watt | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more | |
Noise and Power | |
| | |
| TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more | |
| 6.3 | Overall Score |
| | |
 | Winner |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?
VS
AMD Radeon R9 M290XGPUBoss Winner |  | |
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Better PassMark score | 4,284 | vs | 3,124 | More than 35% better PassMark score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| More memory | 4,096 MB | vs | 2,048 MB | 2x more memory | |||
| Higher memory bandwidth | 153.6 GB/s | vs | 81.6 GB/s | Around 90% higher memory bandwidth | |||
| Better floating-point performance | 2,304 GFLOPS | vs | 1,305.6 GFLOPS | More than 75% better floating-point performance | |||
| Significantly better video composition score | 84.45 frames/s | vs | 26.39 frames/s | Around 3.2x better video composition score | |||
| Higher pixel rate | 28.8 GPixel/s | vs | 13.6 GPixel/s | More than 2x higher pixel rate | |||
| More render output processors | 32 | vs | 16 | Twice as many render output processors | |||
| Higher texture rate | 72 GTexel/s | vs | 40.8 GTexel/s | More than 75% higher texture rate | |||
| More shading units | 1,280 | vs | 768 | 512 more shading units | |||
| More texture mapping units | 80 | vs | 48 | 32 more texture mapping units | |||
| Better PassMark direct compute score | 2,527 | vs | 1,411 | Around 80% better PassMark direct compute score | |||
| More compute units | 20 | vs | 12 | 8 more compute units | |||
| |||||||
| Slightly higher effective memory clock speed | 5,100 MHz | vs | 4,800 MHz | More than 5% higher effective memory clock speed | |||
| Slightly higher memory clock speed | 1,275 MHz | vs | 1,200 MHz | More than 5% higher memory clock speed | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of Radeon R9 M290X vs Pro 555
Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench
Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench
Ocean surface simulation Data courtesy CompuBench
Particle simulation Data courtesy CompuBench
T-Rex (Compubench 1.5) Data courtesy CompuBench
Video composition Data courtesy CompuBench
T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench
Manhattan (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $280 | ||
| GeForce GTX 1050 Ti vs 1060 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $280 | ||
| GeForce GTX 1060 vs 970 | ||
| | VS | |
| GeForce GTX 1050 Ti vs 970 | ||
 | VS | |
| GeForce GTX 960 vs 970 | ||
 | VS | |
| $280 | ||
| Radeon RX 580 vs GeForce GTX 1060 | ||
| | VS | |
| GeForce GTX 1050 Ti vs 960 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $274 | ||
| GeForce GTX 960 vs 750 Ti | ||
