0 Comments
| Radeon R9 M295X Mac vs GeForce GTX 780M Mac |
VS
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Higher clock speed | 850 MHz | vs | 771 MHz | More than 10% higher clock speed | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Better floating-point performance | 3,482 GFLOPS | vs | 2,368.5 GFLOPS | More than 45% better floating-point performance | |||
Significantly better particle simulation score | 409.67 mInteraction/s | vs | 248.7 mInteraction/s | Around 65% better particle simulation score | |||
More shading units | 2,048 | vs | 1,536 | 512 more shading units | |||
Higher memory clock speed | 1,362 MHz | vs | 1,250 MHz | Around 10% higher memory clock speed | |||
| |||||||
Much lower TDP | 122W | vs | 250W | 2x lower TDP |
Benchmarks Real world tests of Radeon R9 M295X Mac vs GeForce GTX 780M Mac
Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench
Radeon R9 M295X Mac
321.77 mHash/s
GeForce GTX 780M Mac
126.58 mHash/s
Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench
Radeon R9 M295X Mac
71.78 mPixels/s
GeForce GTX 780M Mac
30.69 mPixels/s
Ocean surface simulation Data courtesy CompuBench
Radeon R9 M295X Mac
1,285.14 frames/s
GeForce GTX 780M Mac
1,002.2 frames/s
Particle simulation Data courtesy CompuBench
Radeon R9 M295X Mac
409.67 mInteraction/s
GeForce GTX 780M Mac
248.7 mInteraction/s
T-Rex (Compubench 1.5) Data courtesy CompuBench
Radeon R9 M295X Mac
5.84 frames/s
GeForce GTX 780M Mac
3.26 frames/s
Video composition Data courtesy CompuBench
Radeon R9 M295X Mac
75.35 frames/s
GeForce GTX 780M Mac
39.78 frames/s
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$280 | ||
1050 Ti vs 1060 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$280 | ||
1060 vs 970 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
1050 Ti vs 970 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
1050 Ti vs 960 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$280 | ||
RX 580 vs 1060 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
960 vs 970 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
R9 390 vs 970 | ||