Winner
AMD Radeon R9 M295X
GPUBoss recommends the AMD Radeon R9 M295X based on its .
See full details Radeon R9 M295X vs GeForce GTX 1050 |
Released November, 2014
AMD Radeon R9 M295X
- 723 MHz
- 4 GB GDDR5
6.2 Out of 10
by www.tweaktown.com (Oct, 2015)4K gaming is something that AMD says is the best on the Fury X, thanks to it being "fueled by a 4096-bit high-bandwidth memory interface for extreme performance and power efficiency.
VS
Released October, 2016
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050
- 1.4 GHz
- 2 GB GDDR5
6.9 Out of 10
by www.tweaktown.com (Oct, 2016)NVIDIA's impressive Pascal architecture has some nice tricks under its 16nm FinFET hood, but the Twin Frozr VI cooler is 40% quieter than its predecessor (the Twin Frozr V), and it also keeps the card 20% cooler.
GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of R9 M295X vs 1050 among all GPUs
Gaming | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more | |
Graphics | |
| | |
| T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more | |
Computing | |
| | |
| Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more | |
Performance per Watt | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more | |
Noise and Power | |
| | |
| TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more | |
| 6.9 | Overall Score |
| | |
 | Winner |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| More memory | 4,096 MB | vs | 2,048 MB | 2x more memory | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Much better T-Rex score | 4,707.39 | vs | 3,357.16 | More than 40% better T-Rex score | |||
| Significantly more shading units | 2,048 | vs | 640 | 1408 more shading units | |||
| Significantly more texture mapping units | 128 | vs | 40 | 88 more texture mapping units | |||
| Higher memory bandwidth | 160 GB/s | vs | 112.1 GB/s | Around 45% higher memory bandwidth | |||
| Better floating-point performance | 2,961.4 GFLOPS | vs | 1,862 GFLOPS | Around 60% better floating-point performance | |||
| Higher texture rate | 92.5 GTexel/s | vs | 58.2 GTexel/s | Around 60% higher texture rate | |||
| Better video composition score | 68.75 frames/s | vs | 32.65 frames/s | More than 2x better video composition score | |||
| Slightly wider memory bus | 256 bit | vs | 128 bit | 2x wider memory bus | |||
| |||||||
| Much higher clock speed | 1,354 MHz | vs | 723 MHz | More than 85% higher clock speed | |||
| Higher effective memory clock speed | 7,008 MHz | vs | 5,000 MHz | More than 40% higher effective memory clock speed | |||
| Higher pixel rate | 46.56 GPixel/s | vs | 23.14 GPixel/s | More than 2x higher pixel rate | |||
| Significantly higher memory clock speed | 1,752 MHz | vs | 1,250 MHz | More than 40% higher memory clock speed | |||
| Much lower TDP | 75W | vs | 250W | 3.3x lower TDP | |||
| Higher battlefield 4 framerate | 54 | vs | 39.9 | More than 35% higher battlefield 4 framerate | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of Radeon R9 M295X vs GeForce GTX 1050
Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench
Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench
Ocean surface simulation Data courtesy CompuBench
Particle simulation Data courtesy CompuBench
T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench
Battlefield 4
Bioshock Infinite
Crysis 3
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| MX150 vs 1050 | ||
 | VS | |
| 1050 Ti vs 1050 | ||
 | VS | |
| 960 vs 1050 | ||
 | VS | |
| 750 Ti vs 1050 | ||
 | VS | |
| 970 vs 1050 | ||
 | VS | |
| RX 560 vs 1050 | ||
 | VS | |
| RX 460 vs 1050 | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $291 | ||
| RX 580 vs 1060 | ||
| | VS | |
| $291 | ||
| 1050 Ti vs 1060 | ||
| | VS | |
| $291 | ||
| 1060 vs 970 | ||
| | VS | |
| 1050 Ti vs 970 | ||
| | VS | |
| MX150 vs 1050 | ||
| | VS | |
| 1050 Ti vs 960 | ||
| | VS | |
| 1050 Ti vs 1050 | ||
